检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Qihang Xue Huimin Wang Xiaole Ji Jian Wei
机构地区:[1]School of Economics,Shandong University,Ji’nan,Shandong 250100,PR China [2]Zhongtai Securities Institute for Financial Studies,Shandong University,Ji’nan,Shandong 250100,PR China [3]Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)Editorial Office,Ji’nan,Shandong 250100,PR China [4]Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,Shandong University,Ji’nan,Shandong 250100,PR China
出 处:《China Journal of Accounting Research》2023年第3期148-166,共19页中国会计学刊(英文版)
基 金:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.T2293773 and No.T2293770).
摘 要:As a city–county consolidation with Chinese characteristics,China’s countyto-district(CtD)reform transfers a county’s autonomy to a city,thereby strengthening the administrative,decision-making,fiscal and other powers of the prefecture-level municipal government,which effectively enables the centralization of local governments.Based on this exogenous quasi-natural experiment,we use a difference-in-differences(DID)approach to empirically examine the impact of prefecture-level municipal government centralization on companies’ESG performance.The results show that municipal government centralization can significantly promote corporate ESG performance,which represents environmental protection,social responsibility and corporate governance behavior.The mechanism analysis also shows that the CtD reform can address market segmentation,alleviate policy uncertainty and reduce rentseeking,which further improves ESG performance.
关 键 词:Municipal government CENTRALIZATION County-to-district reform ESG Market segmentation Policy uncertainty RENT-SEEKING
分 类 号:D63[政治法律—政治学] F27[政治法律—中外政治制度]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171