社区治理共同体建构路径差异研究——以北京市三个社区为例  

Research on Differences in the Establishment Paths of Primary-Level Governance Communities——A Comparative Analysis of Three Cases in Beijing

作　　者：许文文[1] 张牧辛 Xu Wenwen;Zhang Muxin(School of Humanities and Law,China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing),Beijing,100083,China)

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学(北京)文法学院,北京100083

出　　处：《公共管理学报》2024年第2期77-90,173,共15页Journal of Public Management

基　　金：北京市社会科学基金规划项目(21GLC053);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2023SKPYWF03)。

摘　　要：探究社区治理共同体多元建构路径的差异表象与生成机制,有助于推进基层治理现代化建设进程。本文搭建“情境-主体-行动”分析框架,通过多案例比较研究,发现:(1)社区治理共同体建设存在主体吸纳型、资源撬动型、居民凝聚型三类典型路径。(2)三类路径在联结机制、决策机制、治理绩效等方面存在显著差异。在主体吸纳型路径中,社区居委会通过搭建治理平台,实现以自身为中心的多主体共同行动;在资源撬动型路径中,社会组织通过确定利益耦合点,实现多元主体有效协同;在居民凝聚型路径中,社区居民以治理精英为中心不断凝聚,最终形成治理同心圆。三条路径的治理绩效呈现出阶梯型进阶样态。(3)路径差异的根源是社区治理相关制度的不同。路径差异的生成机制为不同的制度塑造了不同的治理压力传导路径,进而决定了社区治理共同体建构的关键主体,不同的关键主体依据自身的战略性资源采取了差异化的行动方案。经过案例研究和理论对话,本文探究了中国基层治理情境中的合作生产,丰富了社区治理共同体建设的实践内涵。Numerous paths exist for establishing primary-level governance communities.This study aims to delineate the differences in these paths and elucidate the underlying factors contributing to these differences.And this study adopts a multi-case comparative study method,obtaining first-hand and second-hand information from in-depth interviews and field visits.This study establishes an "situation-subject-action" analysis framework and conducts a comparative analysis of three cases in the Beijing area.This study found that:(1)There are three typical paths in the establishment of primary-level governance communities,the subject absorption path,the resource leverage path,and the resident cohesion path.(2)These paths differ significantly in their connection mechanisms,decision-making processes,and governance outcomes.The subject absorption path involves community residents' committees in achieving co-production through platform development.The resource leverage path demonstrates how non-profit organizations can achieve effective co-production by fostering the alignment of interests among multiple subjects.The resident co-hesion path entails community residents coalescing around elite figures to form a governance structure resembling a concentric circle.The gover-nance performance of the three paths demonstrates a ladder-type advanced state.(3)The differences in the establishment paths can be attributed to the institution's influence in shaping distinct channels for governance pressure transmission,which then determines the key subjects involved in the establishment of primary-level governance communities.These subjects devise tailored action plans based on their strategic resources.However the limitation of this study is its representativeness;the three case studies do not fully capture the breadth and depth of practices in China.Further ex-ploration is needed to determine whether there are other paths to the establishment of primary-level governance communities.Are there other fac-tors that cause differences in the path e

关 键 词：城市社区 基层治理 治理共同体 建构路径 合作生产 

分 类 号：D669.3[政治法律—政治学]