检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨静 王文斌 YANG Jing;WANG Wenbin(School of Foreign Languages and Literatures,Chongqing Normal University;National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education,Beijing Foreign Studies University)
机构地区:[1]重庆师范大学外国语学院 [2]北京外国语大学中国外语与教育研究中心
出 处:《当代语言学》2024年第2期193-207,共15页Contemporary Linguistics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“新发展阶段中国外语教育自主知识体系创新研究”(22JJD740011)阶段性成果。
摘 要:学界目前主要从经济性原则(周国光1996)和语体分工(孙汝建1996)解释汉语通用量词“个”的泛化使用。虽各有其理,却有待进一步充实和深入。本文对比分析英汉表量结构以及汉语通用量词与专用量词的差异,主要发现有三:1)汉语量词在表义上具有余性,其认知的实质在于强化名词的空间性;2)专用量词和“个”具有语体分工,是因为两者对空间性表征的详略度不同,在不同程度上满足汉民族表达空间性的心理需求;3)汉语专用量词和通用量词并存,说明汉民族表达空间性的方式已形成详略度不一的选择系统,“个”已演化为表达空间性的图式标记,这既可使空间性表达更具弹性,也更便于人们基于空间性构建非空间性经验,这说明汉语母语者对空间性思维的偏爱。In Chinese,the use of the classifier ge(个)is generalized,which can co-occur with almost all the countable nouns.Existing studies mainly interpret the generalized use of ge from the perspective of the Economy Principle(Zhou 1996).They claim that the development of ge(which is semantically vacuous)is a solution to simplify the classifier system,because the large number of specialized classifiers burdened the memory of people.The present paper holds that the Economy Principle can hardly explain the extensive use of general classifiers adequately.In actuality,the co-existence of general and specialized classifiers further complicates the Chinese classifier system in that the use of Chinese classifiers,including specialized and general classifiers alike,are semantically redundant.Other studies propose there are stylistic differences between specialized vs.general classifiers,with the former being formal and the latter informal(Sun 1996).This idea seems to be widely adopted,but still needs further explanation of the cognitive mechanism underlying the division of labor in register.The present paper makes a contrastive analysis of the classifier systems in English and Chinese and probes into the differences between Chinese general and specialized classifiers.Three main findings are presented as follows.1)Even in the expression of concepts with the highest level of spatiality,i.e.,the individual nouns,Chinese classifier system shows more preferences for spatiality than their English counterparts.In essence,Chinese classifiers are semantically redundant,and their cognitive import lies in their strengthening and superimposing the spatiality on nouns,which indicates Chinese attaches much more importance to the expression of spatiality than English even at the risk of violating the Economy Principle;2)Specialized classifiers and ge have a division of labor in register because they represent different degrees of specificity in spatial representation.The specialized classifiers are more formal because they meet the psychologi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49