我国商标异议制度的改革与完善——借鉴日本商标异议制度改革  

Reform and Improvement of Trademark Opposition System in China--Borrowing Ideas from Japan’s Reform of Trademark Opposition System

作　　者：栗晨曦 LI Chenxi(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学,上海200042

出　　处：《江苏工程职业技术学院学报》2024年第1期105-112,共8页Journal of Jiangsu College of Engineering and Technology

基　　金：2020年国家社科基金重点项目“商标注册审查制度改革研究”(编号:20AFX019)。

摘　　要：简化程序、提高商标注册效率是我国《商标法》历次修改的重点,对商标异议制度的改革是实现这一目标的必经之路。目前我国商标异议制度存在着程序空转严重、授权确权效率低下、制度主导功能不明晰等问题。日本采取注册取得商标权的制度,其商标异议制度经历了从异议前置到异议后置的转变,值得我国借鉴。商标异议制度的定位是权利救济,建议我国实行“全面审查+异议后置”模式,将法定异议期缩短为2个月,对异议主体和异议理由进行限缩,增加第三人陈述意见制度,并取消异议后不予注册的复审。Reforming trademark opposition system is an essential step toward the goal of simplifying the procedures and improving the efficiency of trademark registration,which have been key focuses of successive amendments to China’s Trademark Law.Currently,the trademark opposition system in China is facing such problems as meaningless process,low efficiency in granting and confirming trademark rights,and unclear leading functions.Japan,where trademark rights are obtained through registration,provides us with valuable experience in its reform of trademark opposition system that has transformed from pre-opposition to post-opposition.Since the trademark opposition system is regarded as right remedy,this paper proposed that China implement the“comprehensive examination with post-opposition”mode,shorten the statutory opposition period to two months,limit the opponent and restrict the grounds stated,introduce a third-party statement system,and eliminate the reexamination of refusals after opposition as well.

关 键 词：日本商标异议制度 商标审查 异议后置 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]