检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马志强[1] 张慧玉 MA Zhi-qiang;ZHANG Hui-yu(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
出 处:《兰州文理学院学报(社会科学版)》2024年第3期103-108,共6页Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金项目“民法典编纂与国际私法衔接机制研究”(17BFX153)。
摘 要:一国对跨境代孕的法律态度体现的是本国或者本民族所维护的公共利益和价值追求,因此跨境代孕问题的处理实际是公共秩序在法律多元化环境下的正确适用。而公共秩序保留制度因在跨境代孕中存在适用范围模糊、适用标准不一等问题,在司法实践中常有被“滥用”的情况,严重损害了代孕儿童权益。为回应国际社会对公共秩序保留限制性适用的强烈要求,各国应将保护儿童权益作为处理代孕儿童相关事务的出发点,通过明确公共秩序的效力适用范围、统一其适用标准及深化对其谨慎适用的司法实践,以达至儿童权益与公共秩序间的利益平衡。The legal attitude of various countries to cross-border surrogacy reflects the public interests and value pursuit maintained by a country or a nation.Therefore,the handling of cross-border surrogacy is actually the correct application of public order in the environment of diversified laws.However,the public order reservation system always has a tendency to be “abused” in cross-border surrogacy due to its fuzzy application scope and different application standards,which seriously damages the rights and interests of surrogacy children.In response to the strong demand of the international community for the preservation of restrictive application of public order,countries should take the protection of children's rights as the starting point for handling affairs related to surrogate children.By clarifying the scope of effectiveness and application of public order,unifying its application standards,and deepening judicial practice of cautious application,a balance of interests between children's rights and public order can be achieved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200