全球治理的“内卷式”困境与中国的作为  

The“Involutionary”Dilemma of Global Governance and China’s Response

作　　者：刘雪莲[1] 卓晔 LIU Xuelian;ZHUO Ye

机构地区：[1]吉林大学行政学院,长春130012 [2]云南大学国际关系学院,昆明200020

出　　处：《国际展望》2024年第3期74-92,156,共20页Global Review

基　　金：研究阐释党的十九届六中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目“中国参与全球治理中的软权力建设研究”(22ZDA130);中宣部文化名家暨“四个一批”人才项目“‘一带一路’建设与全球治理创新”的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：2008年国际金融危机后,全球治理逐渐陷入困境,但与此同时全球治理中各类制度、规则广泛建立。现有研究解释不了全球治理失效但各类制度、规则又不断建立的现象。通过引入“内卷”概念,并分析全球治理“量的增长”与“质的停滞”的情形,可以将全球治理所面临的问题称为“内卷式”困境,即全球治理中制度、规则数量的增长并未带来全球治理质的提升。究其原因,全球化进程中的矛盾性在全球治理层面的反映可以解释这种“内卷式”困境,包括国家内部的矛盾性引发对全球治理的质疑、国家主义阻碍了全球治理向全球主义的升级、大国竞争削弱了多元主体的协同性等。面对全球治理的“内卷式”困境,中国提出人类命运共同体理念,以“一带一路”建设推进区域治理发展,减少因大国竞争造成制度、规则间的不一致,为推动全球治理质的提升而贡献力量。Following the global financial crisis of 2008,the trajectory of global governance became increasingly fraught,even as a plethora of institutional rules were established.While many scholars have characterized global governance as dysfunctional,this description only accounts for its quality,failing to explain the simultaneous phenomena of governance failure and rule proliferation.By employing the concept of“involution”and contrasting quantitative growth with qualitative stagnation,this paper interprets the predicament facing global governance as an“involutionary”dilemma,wherein the expansion of institutional rules fails to enhance the essence of global governance.This involution is rooted in the contradictions inherent in the process of globalization,encompassing domestic dissent,statism,and the repercussions of great-power competition.In response to this involution,China advocates for the concept of a community with a shared future for mankind and seeks to elevate regional governance by advancing the Belt and Road Initiative.China aims to mitigate inconsistencies in governance rules,thereby striving to enhance the quality of global governance.

关 键 词：全球治理 内卷 国际制度复杂性 中国外交 

分 类 号：D5[政治法律—政治学]