检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘正全 Liu Zhengquan(Dazhou Administration Institute,Dazhou 635000)
机构地区:[1]达州行政学院,达州635000
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第10期57-60,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:2016年4月发生于山东聊城的于欢故意伤害案曾引发了法学理论界、法律实务界等社会各方人士的强烈关注,甚至成为融媒体网络和街头巷尾的民众们所广泛讨论的热点问题。分析该案一审判决和二审判决的法律适用和审判思路,明确法院判决应当经得起民间大众最基本的法律逻辑推理。法律适用的社会效果要求法院在审理案件中不能只顾机械适用法律条文,而更应结合立法语境与时代因应,使司法审判符合社会主义法治与社会主义核心价值观的要求,以保护民众的生命安全作为实现公平正义的重要基准。The intentional injury case of Yu Huan,which took place in Liaocheng,Shandong Province in April 2016,has aroused the strong concern of people from legal theory,practice and other walks of life,and has even become a hot issue widely discussed in the integrated media network and in the streets and lanes.This paper analyzes the application of the law and the thinking of the trial in both the first and second instance judgments in this case to make it clear that the court’s judgment should withstand the most basic legal reasoning of the general public.The social effect of legal application requires courts to not only mechanically apply legal provisions in the trial of cases,but also consider the legislative context and the era,so that judicial trials can comply with the requirements of socialist rule of law and socialist core values with protecting the safety of people’s lives as an important benchmark for achieving fairness and justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.107.192