检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕强[1] Lv Qiang
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学新闻传播学院
出 处:《法学教育研究》2024年第1期96-117,共22页Legal Education Research
基 金:2018年国家社科基金青年项目“近代西北地方传播西医防疫思想研究”(18CXW016)。
摘 要:在近代“西学东渐”的历史潮流下,清末民初,社会舆论推动了西式法学教育的出现与发展,但受传统谋官心态以及逐利目的的影响,法学教育呈现“跃进”式的发展状况,致使民国初期各类法律学校数量一度激增至67所。面对此种乱象,社会舆论再度发挥监督作用,以谴责批评的方式助推政府通过教育管控、学校裁撤以及自我整改来规制此种乱象,并取得了明显效果。回顾清末民初法学教育“跃进”式发展的历史脉络,在看到其发展乱象的同时,也要认识到其在传播法律知识、培养法治理念和培育政法人才方面对近代中国的贡献。Under the historical trend of“Dissemination of Western Learning”in modern times,at the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China,the public opinion promoted the emergence and development of Western legal education.However,influenced by the traditional mindset of seeking the bureaucrat and benefit,legal education showed a“leap forward”development which lead to a surge in the number of virous law schools in the early Republic of China to 67.Faced with such chaos,public opinion once again played a supervisory role,using condemnation and criticism to help the government regulate such chaos through education control,school elimination and self-rectification.And it achieved remarkable results.Reviewing the“leap forward”development history of legal education in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China,while seeing the chaos of its development,the author of this paper contends that people should also recognize its contribution to modern China in disseminating legal knowledge,cultivating the concept of rule of law and political and legal talent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117