检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐伟功 张亚军 LI Donglin(Translated) XU Weigong;ZHANG Yajun(School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law)
机构地区:[1]School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law [2]不详
出 处:《The Journal of Human Rights》2023年第6期1319-1346,共28页人权(英文版)
基 金:the National Social Science Fund Major Project“Research on the Construction of Systems Applicable Outside the Chinese Jurisdiction in the Perspec-tive of Private International Law”(Project Approval Number 20&ZD202);the National Social Science Fund Key Project“Empirical Research on Judges’Discretion in Foreign-related Civil Trials in China”(Project Approval Number 19AFX026).
摘 要:Personality rights are basic rights related to human dignity in the concept of human rights protection,and respect for personality rights is the basic prerequisite for safeguarding other human rights.Human rights protection exerts a profound impact on the value of legislation and enforcement practices of private international laws in the field of cross-border personality rights infringement in various countries,which is mainly manifested in the integration of substantive justice and the humanistic care concept of protecting the rights of vulnerable groups into formal justice,and expands the development space of human rights protection ideas in cross-border personality rights and tort conflict laws.the diversity of human rights protection values determines that cross-border personality rights infringement may lead to conflicts between personality rights and other basic rights,such as freedom of speech.to reconcile such conflicts,a workable method is to prioritize personality rights protection in accordance with the hierarchy of rights theory in the value judgment of public order reservation or to clarify the limits of the right holder’s tolerance obligation through the limited application of the principle of proportionality.China’s current cross-border personality rights and tort conflict law can optimize the protection of the rights of vulnerable groups by diversifying the options of available legal methods,and establish a balancing mechanism between personality rights and freedom of speech,so as to improve China’s legal protection system for human rights in the field of foreign-related civil and commercial affairs.
关 键 词:human rights protection protection of the rights of vulnerable groups substantive justice personality rights and tort conflict laws
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.192.109