肇建与重修:明代高阳文庙丛考——以河北省社会科学院所藏高阳碑刻拓片为中心  

Initial Construction and Renovation:A Study of Gaoyang Confucian Temple in the Ming Dynasty—Centered around the Gaoyang Inscription Rubbings Collected by Hebei Academy of Social Sciences

作　　者：刘美然[1] Liu Meiran(Research Center of Provincial Situation,Hebei Academy of Social Sciences,Shijiazhuang,China)

机构地区：[1]河北省社会科学院省情研究所,河北石家庄050051

出　　处：《社会科学论坛》2024年第3期119-130,共12页Tribune of Social Sciences

基　　金：河北省社会科学发展研究课题《河北省社科院藏高阳碑刻拓片所见明代高阳文庙》阶段性成果,项目编号:20230204018

摘　　要：明代地方府、州、县学,又称为庙学,其兴废盛衰是衡量当时某地文教科举发展的一个重要指标。河北省社科院所藏高阳碑刻拓片中与明代文庙有关者有12通,其中标题直接标识文庙重修者有4通。通过这些碑刻并结合其他典籍和碑刻资料可知,高阳文庙肇建于洪武三年(1370年)的说法是错误的,其至晚可追溯至宋元时期。自洪武三年易址重建后,各时期重修不辍,但分布并不均衡,主要集中于明万历年间。这与该地当时文教和科举之盛呈正相关,并相互促进。In the Ming Dynasty,local government,state,and county schools,also known as temple schools,were important indicators for measuring the development of cultural and educational examinations in a certain area at that time.There are 12 parts related to the Ming Dynasty Confucian Temple in the Gaoyang Inscriptions Rubbings collected by Hebei Academy of Social Sciences,among which 4 are directly identified by the title as the restorers of the Confucian Temple.By analyzing these inscriptions,combined with other classics and inscriptions,it can be concluded that the statement that the Gaoyang Confucian Temple was built in the third year of Hongwu(1370)is incorrect and the temple can be traced back to the Song and Yuan dynasties at the latest.After its relocation and reconstruction in the third year of the Hongwu reign,it has been continuously renovated in various periods,but its distribution is uneven,mainly concentrated in the Wanli period of the Ming Dynasty.This is positively correlated with the prosperity of culture,education and imperial examination in the area at that time which are mutually reinforcing.

关 键 词：高阳碑刻拓片 明代 文庙 科举 万历 

分 类 号：K85[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]