检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵砚霞[1] 王群秀 赵成花[2] 王红 董青 ZHAO Yanxia;WANG Qunxiu;ZHAO Chenghua;WANG Hong;DONG Qing(Sterilization and Supply Center of Operating Room,Weifang Yidu Central Hospital,Weifang,Shandong Province,262500 China;Department of Gynecology,Weifang Yidu Central Hospital,Weifang,Shandong Province,262500)
机构地区:[1]潍坊市益都中心医院手术室消毒供应中心,山东潍坊262500 [2]潍坊市益都中心医院妇科,山东潍坊262500
出 处:《中外医疗》2024年第7期124-128,共5页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
基 金:潍坊市卫生健康委科研项目(2021X051670)。
摘 要:目的探究压力性损伤风险评估表对手术患者压力性损伤发生的护理效果影响。方法随机选取2020年1月-2021年12月潍坊市益都中心医院收治的200例外科手术患者为研究对象,以随机数表法分为观察组和对照组,每组100例。观察组采用Braden压力性损伤评估量表护理干预,对照组采用常规护理干预,对比两组患者的相关指标。结果观察组压力性损伤发生率为6.00%,低于对照组的17.00%,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=5.944,P<0.05)。观察组压力性损伤分期结果中,1期4例,2期1例,3期1例,4期0例,和对照组(1期3例,2期4例,3期10例,4期0例)相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组护理满意度为97.00%,高于对照组87.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过采用压力性损伤风险评估表护理干预,能够对压力性损伤患者的压力性损伤风险进行评估,也能够对患者的恢复情况进行判别。Objective To investigate the influence of stress injury risk assessment form on the nursing effect of stress injury occurrence in surgical patients.Methods 200 surgical patients admitted to Weifang Yidu Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021 were randomly selected as the study subjects.They were randomly divided into an ob-servation group and a control group using a random number table method,with 100 patients in each group.The obser-vation group received nursing intervention using the Braden Stress Injury Assessment Scale,while the control group received conventional nursing intervention.The relevant indexes of the two groups of patients were compared.Results The stress injury incidence in the observation group was 6.00%,lower than the control group's 17.00%,and the differ-ence was statistically significant(χ^(2)=5.944,P<0.05).In the staging results of pressure injury in the observation group,there were 4 cases in stage 1,1 case in stage 2,1 case in stage 3,and 0 cases in stage 4.Compared with the control group(3 cases in stage 1,4 cases in stage 2,10 cases in stage 3,and 0 cases in stage 4),the difference was not statis-tically significant(P>0.05).The Nursing care satisfaction of the observation group was 97.00%,which was higher 87.00%than of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion By using the nursing intervention of stress injury risk assessment form,it is able to assess the risk of stress injury of the patients with stress injury,and also able to discriminate the recovery of patients.
关 键 词:Braden压力性损伤评估量表 压力性损伤发生率 压力性损伤分期
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38