检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴敏 周黎安[2] 石光[3] Wu Min;Zhou Li'an;Shi Guang
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学国际经济贸易学院,北京100029 [2]北京大学光华管理学院,北京100871 [3]国务院发展研究中心金融研究所,北京100010
出 处:《复印报刊资料(财政与税务)》2023年第7期74-85,共12页
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目“中国县级政府的税收分成:事实、决定与影响”(72273024);国家自然科学基金重大项目“数字经济反垄断理论与政策研究”(72192844);国家自然科学基金青年项目“太空视角下的城镇化政治周期与边界效应”(71704034)。
摘 要:因为数据限制,现有研究大多依靠测算法和推算法来获得我国多层级政府的税收分成比例,但可靠性无从验证。本文使用一套独特的全国基层税务机构的税收收入数据,精确计算了县级政府与其上级的中央、省和市各级政府之间的税收分成比例,并对文献中流行的测算法和推算法的有效性进行了验证。本文还利用该数据进一步刻画了县级政府税收分成比例的典型化事实,得到如下重要的研究结论:(1)县的税收分成比例约为41%,约为市辖区的税收分成比例(27%)的1.5倍;(2)省份之间和同省份不同地级市之间的政府间税收分成情况差异较大;(3)财政省直管县、扩权县和产粮大县的县级税收分成比例明显高于普通县;(4)县级政府的经济地位越高,县级政府的税收分成比例越低。China has a hierarchical governance structure consisting of five-levels:the central government,provincial governments,municipal governments,county governments,and township governments.The government from top down implements an"administrative subcontract system",whereby the superior government delegates relevant ad-ministrative authorities and public services to the subordinate government,while granting the latter certain fiscal rights and proportion of the tax revenue to incentivize local economic development and the provision of local public goods.Ex-tensive literature suggests that fiscal decentralization has played a critical role in China's sustained and rapid economic growth since the introduction of the reform and opening up policy in 1978.One of the key challenges in studying China's fiscal decentralization and local governments'fiscal incentives is how to measure the distribution of fiscal power among governments.In recent years,some scholars have advocated using the tax revenue sharing ratio between superior and subordinate governments to measure the degree of fiscal decentraliza-tion and the intensity of fiscal and tax incentives between governments at different levels.Due to data limitations,most existing research relies on measurement and calculation methods to obtain the tax revenue sharing ratio of China's multi-level governments,but the result cannot be reliably verified.In this study,we employ a unique dataset to accurately calculate the tax revenue sharing ratio between county-level governments and the higher central,provincial,and municipal governments.We also verify the validity of popular measurement and inference methods in existing literature.Moreover,we use this dataset to describe the stylized facts of the tax revenue sharing ratio of county-level governments and come to several key research conclusions.Firstly,the tax revenue sharing ratio of county-level governments is about 41%,approximately 1.5 times that of municipal governments(27%).Secondly,the ratio differs significantly from provi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.14.238.102