吕振羽对中国史前史研究的方法论贡献  

Analysis on LV Zhenyu's Methodological Contribution to the Chinese Pre-history History Study

作　　者：李勇[1] LI Yong

机构地区：[1]淮北师范大学历史文化旅游学院暨史学理论与史学研究中心,安徽淮北235000

出　　处：《湖北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第3期48-56,178,共10页Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“二战后全球马克思主义史学理论文献的整理和研究”(22Z&ZD250)。

摘　　要：关于史前期的神话传说是否具有史料价值,是摆在现代中国史家面前的共同难题。吕振羽提出把中国史与世界史进行比较,把神话传说与出土文物加以互证,实现两个契合,并以此为方法进行中国原始社会研究,这样的神话传说就具有史料价值。他的这一方法论主张发徐炳昶、孙作云神话传说研究理论之先声,得到吴泽、翦伯赞等的继承和发展,在学术史上有首创之功。吕振羽为突破实验主义方法的局限,在郭沫若的基础上继续探索,在处理神话传说方面寻找出突破口,是中国学者在史料学上的创新。吕振羽开启的这一方法路径,是马克思主义史家面对中国历史问题,以马克思主义基本原理为指导,结合中国历史发展实际,开拓出的具有中国本土特色的学术体系,在中国史学面临理论和方法建设、中国文明起源探讨、中国古史体系构建等一系列重大问题的新时代,仍具有重要的启发意义和实践价值。Whether the prehistoric myths and legends have historical value is a common dilemma facing historians.Lv Zhenyu proposed that by comparing Chinese history with world history and verifying myths and legends with excavated relics,achieving double agreements,such myths and legends would have historical value.His propositions were consistent with those of Xu Bingchang and Sun Zuochun,and were further developed by Wu Ze and Jin Bozan.Lv Zhenyu,in an effort to break the limitations of the experimentalist method,continued to explore on the basis of Guo Moruo's work and sought a breakthrough in dealing with myths and legends,which was a major innovation in Chinese scholars historiography.Especially in the new era,Chinese historiography faces the construction of theories and methods,the exploration of the origin of Chinese civilization,and the construction of the ancient Chinese history system.His proposal and practice of using myths and legends to study prehistoric history predicted a research path for solving these problems.

关 键 词：吕振羽 中国史前史 神话传说 考古 古代文明 中国史学 

分 类 号：K03[历史地理—历史学]