中国东部地区能源环境效率评价及环境策略选择研究——基于自然处置和管理处置动态交叉效率模型  

Research on Energy Environmental Efficiency Evaluation andEnvironmental Strategy Selection in Eastern China——Based on the Dynamic Cross-efficiency Model of NaturalDisposability and Management Disposability

作　　者：向小东 项伟 XIANG Xiaodong;XIANG Wei(School of Economic and Management,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China)

机构地区：[1]福州大学经济与管理学院,福建福州350108

出　　处：《运筹与管理》2024年第3期148-154,共7页Operations Research and Management Science

基　　金：福建省创新战略研究项目(2021R0016)。

摘　　要：随着环境问题的日益严峻,如何提高能源利用效率,逐渐成为中国经济发展亟待解决的重要问题。而东部地区是中国改革开放的先行区域,其节能减排经验和措施可以在一定程度上为其他区域提供参考。为从自互评体系研究中国东部地区在自然处置和管理处置策略下的动态能源环境效率,论文建立了自然处置和管理处置动态交叉效率模型,根据《中国统计年鉴》(2016—2020),《中国能源统计年鉴》(2016—2020)的相关数据,对2015—2019年中国东部地区的能源环境效率和环境策略选择进行实证研究。结果表明:2015—2019年期间,大多数省市在自然处置下的能源环境效率更高,而管理处置下大部分省市能源环境效率偏低,有较大的节能减排潜力。从整个研究时期来看,天津之外的省市采取自然处置策略对能源环境效率的提高更有效,而天津采取管理处置策略对提高效率更有帮助。In recent years,with the continuous increase in global energy consumption,the resource and environmental pressures faced by China’s sustained economic growth due to environmental pollution,climate change,and other impacts have become a focus of attention for the government and various sectors of society.How to improve energy utilization efficiency has gradually become an important issue that urgently needs to be solved in China’s economic development.The eastern region is a leading one for China’s reform and opening up,and its energy-saving and emission reduction experience and measures can provide reference for other regions to a certain extent.Therefore,using scientific quantitative methods to evaluate the energy and environmental efficiency of the eastern region is of great significance for improving the energy utilization efficiency of the eastern region and comprehensively establishing a two-type society of“resource conservation and environmental friendliness”.In the study of energy and environmental efficiency evaluation,scholars mainly use Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)methods,but existing research still have shortcomings:(1)Existing research mainly focuses on self-evaluation systems,and rarely evaluates efficiency from mutual-evaluation systems,leading to incomplete evaluation results.(2)Regarding unexpected outputs in energy and environmental systems,previous studies have mostly established DEA models by distinguishing between weak disposability and strong disposability.Weak disposability assumes that all decision-making units adopt the same emission reduction strategy,while strong disposability assumes that unexpected outputs can be arbitrarily reduced,which is inconsistent with the actual production process of decision-making units.(3)Previous studies have mostly evaluated the energy and environmental efficiency of decision-making units,with little research on their environmental strategy choices in response to environmental regulations.In response to the above shortcomings,the paper combines

关 键 词：能源环境效率 压他型交叉效率 自然处置 管理处置 环境策略 

分 类 号：F205[经济管理—国民经济]