法律漏洞填补的比较法适用  

The Application of Comparative Law in the Filling of Legal Loopholes

作　　者：苏彦新 赵阳[2] Su Yan-xin;Zhao Yang

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院 [2]华东政法大学

出　　处：《苏州大学学报（法学版）》2024年第2期90-104,共15页Journal of Soochow University：Law Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“欧洲中世纪共同法研究”(项目编号:23BFX210)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：市场化和全球化的不断深入,使得我国法律与国际法、国外法律的交互沟通日益频繁,各国面临的法律问题也出现更大程度的相似性。本国法律无法解决的棘手案件,时常可以在外国尤其是发达国家的法律中找到解决方案和途径。在本国法律存在漏洞时,出于实用主义、思维经济性与便宜性的考量,法官可以将比较法作为一种法律漏洞的填补工具服务于本国的司法实践。法院自主地适用比较法填补法律漏洞,是其在司法权限之内所为的法律活动,并不违背一国司法之主权。在全球化趋势、“一带一路”和涉外法治建设的大背景下,适用比较法填补法律漏洞对于推进我国法治建设具有重要意义。The continuous deepening of marketization and globalization has made the interaction and communication between Chinese law and international law increasingly frequent,and has also caused the legal problems faced by various countries to have a great degree of similarity.Difficult problems that cannot be solved by domestic laws can often be found in the laws of foreign countries,especially from the developed countries.When there is a loophole in the domestic law,for the consideration of pragmatism,economic thinking and cheapness,the judge can use the comparative law as a tool to fill the loophole and serve the judicial practice of the country.The independent and voluntary application of comparative law by judges to fill legal loopholes is a kind of legal creation activity within their judicial authority,which does not violate the judicial sovereignty of a country.Under the background of the unstoppable trend of globalization and the continuous advancement of the“Belt and Road Initiative”and the foreign rule of law construction,the application of comparative law to fill legal loopholes has great significance to promote the rule of law construction in China.

关 键 词：法律漏洞 比较法 填补漏洞 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]