马克思主义视域下的波德莱尔——论本雅明《波德莱尔笔下第二帝国的巴黎》  

Baudelaire From the Perspective of Marxism:On Benjamin's The Paris of the Second Empire in Baudelaire

作　　者：康欣欣 李茂增 KANG Xinxin;LI Maozeng(School of Literature,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou 511450,Guangdong,China)

机构地区：[1]广州大学人文学院,广东广州511450

出　　处：《惠州学院学报》2024年第2期123-128,共6页Journal of Huizhou University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(22BZW032)。

摘　　要：在历史唯物主义指导下,本雅明批判波德莱尔过分夸大了作者和作品独立性的革命力量:波德莱尔迷恋诗歌暴动和现代主义英雄对社会的破坏性,而不知革命的真正力量是无产阶级;闲逛拱廊街和移情人群,看似是对劳动异化的反抗,实际已沦为出卖劳动力的商品;为实现艺术自律而提出的现代主义美学理论,因生产脱离社会现实的虚假意象反而壮大了资本主义商品拜物教的声势。本雅明超越了波德莱尔,转变为作为生产者的作者,旨在发动一场真正的技术革命,以推动无产阶级革命的到来。Under the guidance of Historical Materialism,Benjamin criticized Baudelaire for overstating the revolutionary power of the independence of the author and works:Baudelaire was obsessed with the destructiveness of the poetry riots and modernist heroes to society,but did not know that the real power of revolution was the proletariat;Strolling through Arcades and empathizing with crowds might seem like resistance to labor alienation,but in reality,he became a commodity for selling labor;The Modernist aesthetic theory put forward to achieve artistic self-discipline strengthened the momentum of capitalist commodity fetishism because of the illusory image of production divorced from social reality.Benjamin transcended Baudelaire and became the author as producer,aiming to launch a real technological revolution to promote the arrival of the proletarian revolution.

关 键 词：本雅明 波德莱尔 历史唯物主义 作为生产者的作者 

分 类 号：B089.1[哲学宗教—哲学理论] I206[文学—中国文学]