检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周永进 徐桂娟 魏爱淳 杨波 ZHOU Yongjin;XU Guijuan;WEI Aichun;YANG Bo(Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,Haian Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Haian,Jiangsu 226600)
出 处:《智慧健康》2024年第4期154-156,共3页Smart Healthcare
摘 要:目的 探讨微创脊柱创伤手术的安全性。方法 选取2021年6月—2022年6月本院收治的182例脊柱创伤患者作为研究对象,根据患者意愿分常规组(行传统手术)与微创组(行微创脊柱创伤手术),每组91例,比较两种手术临床安全性。结果 微创组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛评分、住院时间、卧床时间各项指标均优于对照组(P<0.05);微创组患者术后不良反应发生率远低于常规组,两组数据存在明显差异(P<0.05);微创组治疗满意度远远高于常规组(P<0.05)。结论 采用微创脊柱创伤手术治疗脊柱创伤,具有较高的安全性,减少患者术后并发症的发生,对患者创伤较小,缩短住院时间,临床治疗满意度较高。Objective To investigate the safety of minimally invasive spinal trauma surgery.Methods From June 2021 to June 2022,182 patients with spinal trauma were taken as the research objects.According to the patients'wishes,they were divided into conventional group(traditional surgery)and minimally invasive group(minimally invasive spinal surgery),91 cases in each group,and the clinical safety of the two kinds of surgery was compared.Results All indexes of minimally invasive group were better than those of conventional group(P<0.05);The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions in minimally invasive group was much lower than that in conventional group,and there were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05).Treatment satisfaction in minimally invasive group was much higher than that in conventional group(P<0.05).Conclusion The use of minimally invasive spinal trauma surgery for spinal trauma has higher safety,reduces the occurrence of postoperative complications,has less trauma to patients,shorten the length of hospital stay,and has higher satisfaction in clinical treatment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222