检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:项继权 侯亚丽 Xiang Jiquan;Hou Yali
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学政治与国际关系学院,湖北七武汉430079
出 处:《复印报刊资料(社会工作)》2023年第4期81-90,共10页Social Work
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“党领导基层群众自治的社会整合机制研究”(20CDJO14);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金“城市社区治理共同体生成要素与可持续发展机制研究”(21YJC840030)。
摘 要:随着政府向社会力量购买服务的发展,社工组织已成为我国重要的公共服务供给主体。然而,在与政府合作提供公共服务的过程中,社工组织却频遭多权力主体的行政摊派,日益行政化。科层制视角下的案例研究表明,政府科层治理模式中的等级控制思想、层级控制权分配、等级权力支配结构在根源上分别造成委托方、中间管理方和项目落地基层组织对社工组织的行政摊派,而社工组织面对多方的行政支配之所以选择“妥协”则主要基于生存发展及良好合作的“关系理性”。With the development of government purchasing services from social forces,social work organizations have become an important public service provider in our country.However,in the process of cooperating with the government to provide public services,social work organizations are frequently subject to administrative apportionment by multiple power subjects,and are increasingly administrative.The case study from the perspective of bureaucracy shows that the idea of hierarchical control,the distribution of hierarchical control power,and the structure of hierarchical power domination in the government's bureaucratic governance model respectively cause the entrusting party,the intermediate management party,and the project landing grassroots organizations to assign administrative tasks to social work organizations.And the reason why social work organizations choose"compromise"in the face of multiple administrative domination is mainly based on the"relational rationality"of survival,development and good cooperation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49