检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:雷翰岳 敬龙军 黄丹[1] 唐怡伟 彭健 Lei Hanyue;Jing LongJun;Huang Dan;Tang Yiwei;Peng Jian(Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan 411201,China)
机构地区:[1]湖南科技大学,湖南湘潭411201
出 处:《体育科技文献通报》2024年第4期1-5,8,共6页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology
摘 要:本文运用帕累托分析法和比较优势理论,以第16届至第20届世界游泳锦标赛参赛队各游泳项目成绩为研究对象,系统分析各游泳优势队在竞技游泳、跳水、花样游泳、公开水域游泳、水球和高台跳水的成绩,探究世界游泳竞技格局的动态演变。结果表明,(1)美国队、中国队、澳大利亚队、意大利队、英国队、俄罗斯队、加拿大队和日本队为第16届至第20届世界游泳锦标赛游泳优势队;(2)俄罗斯队与中国队比较优势项目重叠较多;(3)加拿大队各比赛项目比较优势指数与中国队较为接近,俄罗斯队和加拿大队是中国队比较优势项目中的重要竞争对手;(4)各游泳优势队的绝对优势指数分别在不同项目中有不同程度的波动,世界游泳竞技格局正在发生动态演变。据此,建议:优化资源统筹,强化信息收集,科技助力提升游泳备战效果,增强国际竞争力。Using Pareto analysis method and comparative advantage theory,with the results of the 16th to 20th World Aquatics Championships as the research object,the swimming,water polo,diving,synchronized swimming,and open water swimming are systematically analyzed,so as to explore the dynamic evolution of the world swimming competitive pattern.The study shows that:(1)the teams of United States,China,Australia,Italy,Great Britain,Russia,Canada and Japan had advantages in the 16th~20th World Aquatics Championships.(2)Russia and China had more overlapping comparative advantage events.(3)The comparative advantage index of Canada was close to China,and Russia and Canada were important competitors in China's comparative advantage events.(4)The absolute advantage index of each swimming advantage team fluctuates in different events,and the world swimming competition pattern is undergoing dynamic evolution.It is suggested to optimize resource coordination,strengthen information collection,use technology to improve training effect and enhance international competitiveness.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33