滥用管辖权异议的规制——以涉外知识产权诉讼为切入点  

Regulations on the Abuse of Jurisdictional Objections:Starting from Foreign-Related Intellectual Property Litigation

作　　者：张广良[1,2] 巩凡 Zhang Guangliang;Gong Fan

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院 [2]中国人民大学国际知识产权研究中心

出　　处：《知识产权》2024年第4期82-91,共10页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：违背诚实信用原则的滥用管辖权异议行为应予以规制。在现行法律体系下,我国司法机关可通过管辖权异议案件的快速审理对滥用管辖权异议行为予以训诫,甚至可以在管辖权异议未决时通过实体审理等方式遏制滥用管辖权异议行为。建议《民事诉讼法》明确滥用管辖权异议的行为构成妨碍民事诉讼行为,依法应予以惩罚;同时规定受诉法院在案件管辖权异议争议未决的情形下,对是否继续进行实体审理享有自由裁量权。Acts of abusing jurisdictional objections that violate the principle of good faith should be regulated.Under the current legal system,Chinese judicial authorities can admonish the abuse of jurisdiction objections through the expedited trial of jurisdiction objection cases,and even curb the abuse of jurisdiction objections through substantive trials when jurisdiction objections are pending.It is recommended that the Chinese Civil Procedure Law clearly stipulate that abuse of jurisdictional objections constitutes obstruction of civil proceedings and should be punished in accordance with the law;at the same time,it should stipulate that the court hearing the case has discretionary power to continue substantive adjudication when the dispute over jurisdictional objections is unresolved.

关 键 词：管辖权异议 滥用 涉外知识产权诉讼 妨碍民事诉讼 民事诉讼法 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学] D925.1[政治法律—法学]