检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何尧 张璟[1] 刘晓辉[2] He Yao;Zhang Jing;Liu Xiaohui(School of Finance,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics;Institute of Chinese Financial Studies,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)
机构地区:[1]西南财经大学金融学院 [2]西南财经大学中国金融研究院
出 处:《国际金融研究》2024年第3期63-75,共13页Studies of International Finance
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“金融业制度型开放助推构建新发展格局的路径研究”(23&ZD059);国家社会科学基金一般项目“我国环境规制对经常账户的影响与应对策略研究”(19BJL131);国家社会科学基金一般项目“供给侧结构性改革背景下我国宏观金融杠杆波动对技术创新的影响研究”(19BJL029);国家自然科学基金面上项目“新常态下中国货币政策传导的微观机理与信贷配置效应研究”(71973109)资助。
摘 要:本文将人工智能变量以生产任务方式引入Balassa-Samuelson模型(巴萨模型),理论分析人工智能发展对实际汇率的影响。研究发现:可贸易品部门智能化程度提高将导致实际汇率升值,不可贸易品部门智能化程度提高将导致实际汇率贬值。本文以工业机器人安装存量表示智能化程度,利用国际机器人联盟、Peen World Table 10.0和世界发展指标等数据库构建1993—2019年72个国家和地区的平衡面板数据,实证检验发现:可贸易品部门智能化程度提高导致实际汇率升值,且结论在稳健性检验和内生性处理后依然成立;不可贸易品部门智能化程度提高导致实际汇率贬值的结论在统计上不稳健。拓展分析发现:第一,人工智能发展对实际汇率的影响存在滞后效应;第二,分行业而言,制造业智能化程度提高导致实际汇率升值,建筑业智能化程度提高导致实际汇率贬值;第三,OECD成员国可贸易品部门智能化程度提高导致实际汇率升值,不可贸易品部门智能化程度提高导致实际汇率贬值;而非OECD成员国智能化程度改变对实际汇率影响不显著。Intelligence Artificial(AI) will be the new driving force for the world economy.The studies on the economic impact of AI have been one of the hottest topics in economics.However,there are not enough studies on how AI can exert its impact in the field of international trade and international finance.This paper studies the impact of intelligence level on the real exchange rate by introducing the artificial intelligence in Balassa-Samuelson model(B-S model).The theoretical model shows that an increase of intelligence level in tradable sector appreciates the real exchange rate,while the increase of intelligence level in non-tradable sector depreciates the real exchange rate.This paper empirically tests the theoretical hypothesis by using installed stock of industrial robot as the proxy variable of artificial intelligence,along with year' 1993-2019 balanced panel data from 72 countries or regions,sourced from the International Federation of Robotics,Penn Table 10.0 and World Development Index.The empirical results show that,an increase of intelligence level in tradable sector appreciates the real exchange rate,conclusion that holds after robustness checks and addressing endogeneity concerns.However,the increase of intelligence level in non-tradable sector depreciates the real exchange rate is statistically unrobust.The extended results show that,firstly,there is a lagging effect on the impact of intelligence level on the real exchange rate.Secondly,the increase in the intelligence level of manufacturing appreciates the real exchange rate,while the increase in intelligence level of constructure depreciates the real exchange rate.Thirdly,the improvement of intelligence level in OECD members' tradable sectors appreciates the real exchange rate,while the improvement of intelligence level in OECD members' non-tradable sectors depreciates the real exchange rate.However,the intelligence level of both sectors in non-OECD member has no significant impact on the real exchange rate.This paper has two marginal contributions,first
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.129.247