检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡雯 陈博欧 张锦华[3] HU Wen;CHEN Bo-ou;ZHANG Jin-hua(School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100871;School of Economics,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing 210023;Institute of Finance and Economics,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,Shanghai 200433,China)
机构地区:[1]北京大学现代农学院,北京100871 [2]南京财经大学经济学院,江苏南京210023 [3]上海财经大学财经研究所,上海200433
出 处:《山西财经大学学报》2024年第4期1-13,共13页Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(72203003、72303090);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72173080);国家社会科学基金重大项目(23&ZD118);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2021M700225)。
摘 要:采用2013年和2019年上海财经大学千村调查数据,从省级尺度和城市尺度研究随迁子女教育准入政策对农民工就业选址的影响机制。研究发现:低收入的农民工更倾向于选择到教育准入政策宽松的省工作,且有子女随迁的农民工流向行政级别高、人口规模大的城市概率会显著下降;拥有合法稳定工作、购买社会保险和签订正式合同的高收入农民工,更容易达到就业地随迁子女教育的准入门槛。This study employed the data from the Chinese Thousand Village Survey conducted by the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics in 2013 and 2019,to examine the mechanism of the education access policy for migrant children affecting the job location choices of migrant workers at the provincial and municipal level.It was found that:low-income migrant workers exhibited a propensity to seek employment in the provinces with more relaxed education access policy.Additionally,for the migrant workers having migrant children,there was a decrease in the rate of relocating to the cities at a higher administrative level and with larger population size.Besides,certain high-income migrant workers were more able to meet the demands of education access policy for migrant children in employment sites,who might have stable and lawful jobs,social insurance and formal employment contracts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185