出经入文:古史辨派与中国诗经学的现代转型  

From the Classics to Literature:Gushibian Pai and the Modern Transformation of Chinese Shijing Studies

作　　者：郭明浩[1] Guo Minghao

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学文学与新闻学院,湘潭411105

出　　处：《中国文学批评》2024年第2期37-48,189,共13页Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“诗话诗经学研究”(18CZW003)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：古史辨派对传统诗经学进行了全面质疑,并直接推动了中国诗经学的现代转型。全面质疑并挑战传统学术话语的古史辨派试图祛除《诗经》的经学文本身份,消解其合法性与权威性,重新审查前代经说,尤其是在质疑孔子与六经关系的基础上,否定“孔子删诗”说。古史辨派试图弃经入文,重构具有现代色彩的诗经学,集中体现为以现代文学观念再造《诗经》,特别是以秉持民间立场的“歌谣说”最具代表性。古史辨派出经入文,对形塑中国现代诗经学有重要学术意义,但以今日眼光视之,亦自有其不足之处。Gushibian Pai(the Doubting Antiquity School)questioned the traditional Chinese Shijing studies and directly contributed to its modern transformation.The scholars of Gushibian Pai,with the color of cultural patricide,attempted to remove the identity of Shijing as a text of the classics,dissolve its legitimacy and authority,and re-examine existing literature on Shijing.The fact that the scholars of Gushibian Pai moved Shijing from the category of classics into the category of literature is of great academic significance in shaping the discourse of modern Chinese Shijing studies,but from today's point of view,it has its own shortcomings.

关 键 词：古史辨派 诗经学 经学解构 文学再造 现代转型 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]