历史:文学批评通向公共阐释的桥梁  

History:A Bridge Leading Literary Criticism to Public Interpretation

作　　者：郄智毅[1] Qie Zhiyi

机构地区：[1]河北大学文学院,保定071002

出　　处：《中国文学批评》2024年第2期74-81,190,共9页Chinese Journal of Literary Criticism

基　　金：河北省社会科学基金项目“文学公共性视域中批评对创作的作用”(HB18WX007)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：文学批评公共性的前提与结果,都和历史息息相关。文学批评的公共性,首先来源于它的前提。准确描述和探求文本本义、作者原意和历史语境是文学批评扩大认同、获得公信力的重要基础;文学理论史为文学批评的展开提供了各种基本假设前提、阐释范式和评判标准,文学批评以此获得了理论知识的依据;文学史为文学批评的阐释判断提供了历史经验和基础。文学批评的公共性,也来源于它的结果。文学批评不仅是对历史知识的接受,同时也是历史知识的产出与提供,这种可靠历史知识的生产,提升了批评的公共性。批评的前提和结果,呈现为一种动态循环过程。批评以历史公共知识为前提,又扩展、生成了历史公共知识,文学批评的公共性在这一过程中得以不断确证和提升。The premise and outcome of the publicity of literary criticism have intimate relations with history.Accurately describing and exploring the original intentions of texts and authors as well as the historical context is a critical foundation for literary criticism to improve recognition and gain credibility.The history of literary theory provides variations of fundamental assumptions,interpretive paradigms and evaluation criteria for the development of literary criticism,through which literary criticism obtains theoretical knowledge;Literary history provides historical experience and basis for the interpretation and judgment of literary criticism.Literary criticism is not only the acceptance of historical knowledge,but also the output and provision of historical knowledge.This reliable production of historical knowledge enhances the publicity of criticism.

关 键 词：文学批评 公共阐释 历史事实 文学理论史 文学史 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]