以区位导向政策促进全域共同富裕:基于流动、集聚、均衡的分析框架  

Prosperity with Place-Based Policies:Based on the Framework Including Mobility,Agglomeration,and Equilibrium

作　　者：苏红键[1] Su Hongjian

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院农村发展研究所,北京100732

出　　处：《区域经济评论》2024年第3期8-18,共11页Regional Economic Review

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目“城乡福祉、空间均衡与城镇化方略”(20FJLB019)。

摘　　要：基于流动、集聚、均衡的空间经济分析框架,明确了经济特区政策、欠发达地区支持政策、交通与通道建设三大类区位导向政策的基础逻辑,分类总结了典型区位导向政策的实施背景、主要内容及实施效果。第一,区位导向政策对特定地区发展具有一定的促进作用。第二,区位导向政策实施效果存在明显的地区异质性,区位导向政策与地区发展基础的匹配,决定了政策实施效果。第三,区位导向政策的效果评价以双重差分法为主,需要加强投入产出分析和比较制度分析。第四,区位导向政策存在明显的本地效应和空间溢出效应。第五,区位导向政策影响资源空间配置,是其本地效应和空间溢出效应的核心机制。由此,区位导向政策设计需要匹配地区发展基础、适应地区人口发展特征、兼顾公平和效率、兼顾本地效应和溢出效应,以促进城乡区域协调发展和全域共同富裕。Based on the spatial economic analysis framework including mobility,agglomeration and equilibrium,this paper clarifies the basic logic of the three types of PBPs,including the special economic zone policy,the support policy for underdevelopment regions,and the traffic and channel construction,and summarizes their background,contents,and effects.Firstly,PBPs have a certain effect on the development of the specific regions.Secondly,there is significant regional heterogeneity in the effect of PBPs,and the matching between PBPs and the place-foundation determines the effectiveness.Thirdly,the evaluation of PBPs is mainly by the DID,and it is necessary to strengthen input-output analysis and comparative institutional analysis.Fourthly,PBPs have obvious local effects and spatial spillover effects.Fifthly,PBPs affect the spatial allocation of resources,which is the core mechanism of their spatial effects.The design of PBPs needs to match the place-foundation,adapt to the development of the local population,balance fairness and efficiency,and balance local effects and spillover effects,in order to promote of the urban-rural and the regional coordinated development and the national-wide common prosperity.

关 键 词：区位导向政策 城乡区域发展 共同富裕 

分 类 号：F061.5[经济管理—政治经济学]