检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Andrew Collins Jason Jeffrey Jones
机构地区:[1]the Department of Sociology,Stony Brook University,Stony Brook,NY 11790,USA
出 处:《Journal of Social Computing》2023年第3期221-231,共11页社会计算(英文)
基 金:supported by the National Science Foundation(Nos.IIS-1927227 and CCF-2208664).
摘 要:In recent decades,social scientists have debated declining levels of trust in American institutions.At the same time,many American institutions are coming under scrutiny for their use of artificial intelligence(AI)systems.This paper analyzes the results of a survey experiment over a nationally representative sample to gauge the effect that the use of AI has on the American public’s trust in their social institutions,including government,private corporations,police precincts,and hospitals.We find that artificial intelligence systems were associated with significant trust penalties when used by American police precincts,companies,and hospitals.These penalties were especially strong for American police precincts and,in most cases,were notably stronger than the trust penalties associated with the use of smartphone apps,implicit bias training,machine learning,and mindfulness training.Americans’trust in institutions tends to be negatively impacted by the use of new tools.While there are significant variations in trust between different pairings of institutions and tools,generally speaking,institutions which use AI suffer the most significant loss of trust.American government agencies are a notable exception here,receiving a small but puzzling boost in trust when associated with the use of AI systems.
关 键 词:social trust artificial intelligence(AI) algorithm aversion
分 类 号:TP18[自动化与计算机技术—控制理论与控制工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49