骨髓捐献中悔捐行为分析及对策研究  

Contrite behavior in bone marrow donation

作　　者：许晨晨 刘佳 Xu Chenchen;Liu Jia(Mentougou District Qingshui Institute of Justice,Beijing 102300,China)

机构地区：[1]北京市门头沟区清水司法所,北京102300

出　　处：《中国卫生法制》2024年第3期52-57,共6页China Health Law

摘　　要：骨髓志愿捐献行为因行为本身的道德属性及与身体权密切相关的性质,具有完全自愿性和不受干涉性。然而,捐献意志表达到特定阶段,其完全不受干涉及任意退出的权利,客观上可能会加速受捐者的死亡,这两者之间的权利冲突如何解决?法律是否应该介入?通过援引法哲学中关于法律功能的两种实现方式,分析法律介入既具有必要性,也具有法理依据。通过制定义务性宣示条款和权益保障条款,落实法律的指引功能,为权利冲突的解决提供新的思路,有助于矛盾缓和。Because of its moral attributes and the nature closely related to body rights,the behavior of voluntary donation is completely voluntary and free from interference.However,when the donation will is expressed at a specific stage,it is completely free from any right to withdraw,which may objectively accelerate the death of the recipient.How to resolve the conflict of rights between the two?Should the law intervene?By invoking the two ways of realizing the function of law in the philosophy of law,this paper analyzed the necessity and legal basis of legal intervention.By making compulsory declaration clauses and rights protection clauses,the guiding function of law can be implemented,and a new way of thinking can be provided for the settlement of rights conflicts,which is conducive to the easing of conflicts.

关 键 词：骨髓悔捐 法律指引 义务性宣示条款 

分 类 号：D902[政治法律—法学理论]