检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张毅 韩继臣 刘丙勇 何宇 Zhang Yi;Han Jichen;Liu Bingyong;He Yu(Jinan Shizhong District Health and Family Planning Supervision Institute,Jinan 250002,China;Beijing Yingke(Jinan)LawFirm,Jinan 250132,China)
机构地区:[1]济南市市中区卫生和计划生育监督所,济南250002 [2]北京市盈科(济南)律师事务所,济南250132
出 处:《中国卫生法制》2024年第3期110-114,126,共6页China Health Law
摘 要:阐述了一起无行医资格的人未取得医疗机构执业许可证擅自开展中医诊疗活动案件,并对该案进行分析,讨论了本案在中医诊疗行为的判断、违法事实认定、法律适用等方面的问题,针对执法实践中医疗器械的鉴别、“一事不再罚原则”的适用、电子证据的合法性等进行了深入思考,参照国外想象竞合的明示机制对卫生监督执法中作出行政处罚提出了合理化建议。This paper expounded a case of persons without medical qualifications carry out medical diagnosis and treatment activities without obtaining medical institution license.Meanwhile,it analyzes the case and discusses the problems in judgment of traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment behavior,determination of illegal facts,and application of law,etc.The author deeply considered the identification of medical instruments in law enforcement practice,the application of the principle of"no longer punishment for one case",and the legality of electronic evidence.With reference to the explicit mechanism of imaginative concurrence in foreign countries,this paper puts forward reasonable suggestions on the making of administrative punishment in health supervision and law enforcement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.224.138.39