基于直接补水和间接补水方式的经济效益对比研究  

Economic Benefits Based on Direct and Indirect Recharge Methods Comparative Study

作　　者：岳俊 Yue Jun(Taiyuan Heat Group Co.,Ltd.,Taiyuan Shanxi 030013,China)

机构地区：[1]太原市热力集团有限责任公司,山西太原030013

出　　处：《现代工业经济和信息化》2024年第3期237-238,共2页Modern Industrial Economy and Informationization

摘　　要：主要介绍了集中供暖系统中换热站内的两种补水方式,分析了其工作原理以及各自的优缺点,并结合生产运行实际,对比研究了其所产生的经济效益.研究发现直接补水方式能够极大地降低生产运行成本,为无人值守技术的推广奠定了基础.The two methods of water replenishment in the heat exchanger station in the central heating system,are mainly introduced,and their working principles as well as their respective advantages and disadvantages are analysed,and their economic benefits are studied in comparison with the actual production and operation.

关 键 词：定压补水 一补二系统 直接补水 间接补水 

分 类 号：TU995[建筑科学—供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程]