鼻内镜、显微镜配合支撑喉镜在声带息肉手术中的应用对比  

Comparison of nasal endoscopy and microscopy with supported laryngoscopy in vocal cord polyp surgery

作　　者：陈红[1] 金玮[1] 徐盼盼 Chen Hong;Jin Wei;Xu Panpan(Department of Otolaryngology,Head and Neck Surgery,Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Chaohu238000,Anhui,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽医科大学附属巢湖医院耳鼻喉头颈外科,安徽巢湖238000

出　　处：《现代科学仪器》2024年第2期38-41,共4页Modern Scientific Instruments

摘　　要：目的:对比鼻内镜、显微镜配合支撑喉镜在声带息肉手术中的应用效果。方法:选取79例声带前息肉患者,根据术式不同分为A组和B组,对比2组手术相关指标差异。结果:A组手术时间长于B组(P<0.05),术中声带息肉完全暴露率高于B组(P<0.05);术后6个月,A组总有效率高于B组;B组手术无效者均为声带息肉显露困难者;2组总并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:采取鼻内镜配合支撑喉镜治疗声带息肉的手术时间较长,但在声带息肉暴露困难患者的效果较好。除此之外,两种术式可灵活选择。Objective:To compare the effectiveness of nasal endoscopy and microscopy with supported laryngoscopy in vocal fold polyp surgery.Methods:79 patients with anterior vocal fold polyps were selected and divided into Group A and Group B according to the procedure,to compare the differences in the surgery-related indexes between the 2 groups.Results:Group A took longer to operate than group B(P<0.05),and the intraoperative rate of complete exposure of vocal fold polyps was higher than that of group B(P<0.05);at 6 months after the operation,the overall effective rate of group A was higher than that of group B;all the surgical invalids in group B were difficult to reveal vocal fold polyps;the difference in the overall complication rate between the 2 groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:Taking a nasal endoscope with a supported laryngoscope for vocal fold polyps has a longer operative time,but is more effective in patients with difficult exposure of vocal fold polyps.In addition to this,the two procedures can be chosen flexibly.

关 键 词：鼻内镜 显微镜 支撑喉镜 声带息肉 

分 类 号：R767.4[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]