检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李业锦[1] 闫欣雨 王雅倩 申郑钰 熊南 LI Yejin;YAN Xinyu;WANG Yaqian;SHEN Zhengyu;XIONG Nan(College of Resources Environment and Tourism,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100048,China)
机构地区:[1]首都师范大学资源环境与旅游学院,北京100048
出 处:《地域研究与开发》2024年第2期56-62,共7页Areal Research and Development
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(41001105)。
摘 要:基于2020年城市体检问卷调查数据,利用多层线性模型测度我国36个中心城市的城市治理综合水平及其差异,探索影响城市治理的关键因素。结果表明:从空间特征来看,治理评价高水平城市多分布于长江沿线和东部沿海地区,偏低水平多分布在西北地区和东北地区;从城市间差异来看,城市治理存在“短板效应”,城市间生态环境治理和道路环境提升存在显著差异;从关键影响因素来看,居民对城市治理的综合感知受到城市建成环境、城市社会经济条件和个体属性特征共同作用。在城市建成环境变量中,高建成区绿化覆盖率、低PM_(2.5)浓度、高公交站点和商场可达性促进居民对城市治理满意度的提升。在城市社会经济条件变量中,大经济规模、高工资水平增强居民对城市治理的满意度。在个体属性变量中,高龄、高学历及城市“新市民”对城市治理的效果敏感度更高。Based on the data of 2020 city physical examination questionnaire,a multi-layer linear model was used to measure the comprehensive level and differences of urban governance in 36 central cities,and to explore the key factors affecting urban governance.The research shows that:From the perspective of spatial characteristics,the cities with high governance evaluation are mostly distributed along the Yangtze River and the eastern coastal areas,while the cities with low governance evaluation are mostly distributed in the northwest and northeast areas.From the perspective of differences between cities,there is a“weak board effect”in urban governance,and there are significant differences between cities in ecological environment governance and road environment improvement;From the perspective of key influencing factors,residents’comprehensive perception of urban governance is influenced by urban built environment,urban socio-economic conditions and individual attributes.Among the variables of urban built environment,high green coverage rate,low PM_(2.5)concentration and high accessibility of bus stops and shopping malls promote residents’satisfaction with urban governance.Among the variables of urban socio-economic conditions,large economic scale and high wage level enhance residents’satisfaction with urban governance.Among the individual attribute variables,old age,high education and“new citizens”are more sensitive to the effect of urban governance.
关 键 词:城市体检 城市治理 居民感知 多层线性模型 影响因素
分 类 号:K901[历史地理—人文地理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.153.166