中原城市群文化软实力综合评价及空间分异研究  

Comprehensive Evaluation and Spatial Differentiation ofCultural Soft Power in Central Plains Urban Agglomeration

作　　者：李晗[1,2,3] 马芳芳 丁志伟[1,2,3] LI Han;MA Fangfang;DING Zhiwei(The College of Geography and Environmental Science,Henan University,Kaifeng 475004,China;Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River,Henan University,Kaifeng 475004,China;Research Center of Regional Development and Planning,Henan University,Kaifeng 475004,China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学地理与环境学院,河南开封475004 [2]河南大学黄河中下游数字地理技术教育部重点实验室,河南开封475004 [3]河南大学区域发展与规划研究中心,河南开封475004

出　　处：《地域研究与开发》2024年第2期63-70,共8页Areal Research and Development

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(42271213,42301237);河南省研究生教育改革与质量提升工程项目(YJS2024SZ26);河南大学研究生教育教学改革研究与实践项目(YJSJG2022XJ028);河南大学研究生培养创新与质量提升行动计划项目(SYLKC2022003)。

摘　　要：基于文化吸引力、文化展示力、文化传播力、文化创新力、文化事业投入力和文旅融合力6个维度构建文化软实力评价指标体系,运用空间分类、核密度分析、空间自相关等方法,分析中原城市群文化软实力的空间特征并解析其影响因素。结果表明:(1)从综合实力差异看,高、较高文化软实力城市数量少且主要分布在核心区,中等实力城市仅有3个,半数城市为低和较低实力。空间上具有明显的东西差异,西半壁呈现以郑汴为引领的中心外围格局,东半壁则表现为亳州、阜阳引领的极化特征,且在东西半壁之间形成聊城至驻马店的低值连绵带。(2)从分维度空间差异看,文化吸引力子系统、文化展示力子系统与综合实力格局类似,而文化事业投入力子系统呈现“西北高、东南低”的格局。此外,文化传播力子系统、文化创新力子系统呈现与前3个子系统完全不同的格局,表现为以郑汴为核心的低值包围高值的分布结构。(3)从空间集聚和关联看,中原城市群分别围绕郑州和亳州形成了“一主一副”的双核集聚态势,且主核区附近形成了显著的高-高集聚群。其中,文化吸引力子系统与综合实力的集聚格局基本一致,文化展示力子系统的集聚在郑州减弱而在亳州得到加强,文化传播力子系统和文化创新力子系统仅在中部形成集聚核心,文旅融合力子系统则在综合格局的基础上在东南部形成两个集聚核心。(4)从影响因素看,市区GDP对城市文化软实力的影响最强,第三产业增加值次之,交通设施、科教文卫单位数和城镇化率的影响作用不明显。An evaluation index system of cultural soft power is constructed based on six dimensions of cultural attraction,display,communication,innovation,cultural investment and cultural and tourism integration.Taking 30 prefecture-level cities in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration as examples,spatial classification,nuclear density analysis and spatial autocorrelation methods are used to analyze the spatial characteristics of cultural soft power in the Central Plains Urban Agglomeration and analyze its influencing factors.The results show that:(1)From the difference of comprehensive strength,the number of high and higher strength is small and mainly distributed in the core area,only 3 middle strength areas,and half of the cities are distributed in the low and lower strength areas.The western half of the wall shows a central and peripheral pattern led by Zhengzhou and Kaifeng,while the eastern half shows polarization characteristics led by Bozhou and Fuyang,and forms a low-value stretch from Liaocheng to Zhumadian between the eastern and western halves.(2)From the perspective of sub-dimensional spatial differences,the sub-system of cultural attraction and display power is similar to the comprehensive strength,while the sub-system of cultural investment power is“high in the northwest and low in the southeast”.In addition,the sub-systems of cultural transmission and innovation presented a completely different pattern from the previous three sub-systems,showing a distribution structure with low value surrounded by high value with Zhengzhou and Kaifeng as the core.(3)From the perspective of spatial agglomeration and correlation,the Central Plains region has formed a dual-core agglomeration situation of“one master and one pair”around Zhengzhou and Bozhou respectively,and a significant HH agglomeration group has formed near the main core area.Among them,the concentration pattern of the cultural attraction subsystem and comprehensive strength is basically the same,the concentration center of the cultural display power

关 键 词：文化软实力 水平评价 空间差异 影响因素 中原城市群 

分 类 号：G124[文化科学]