检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘润全 PAN Run-quan(Donga University,Busan,South Korea,48974)
机构地区:[1]东亚大学,韩国釜山48974
出 处:《广东开放大学学报》2024年第2期51-57,共7页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY
基 金:2022年度国家社科基金青年项目“新疆地区民事司法中运用《民法典》习惯条款的规范与实证研究”(22CFX025)。
摘 要:“泸州遗赠案”的实质在于其所表现出来的多层面的冲突关系,该冲突关系在制度层面、价值层面和利益层面均有体现。正是存在这种由制度引发的冲突关系才使得这一案件复杂化,制度冲突的背后则是价值冲突,而制度冲突和价值冲突则以利益冲突的形式表现出来的。解决三种冲突关系的突破口在于制度冲突,从理论及法律两个层面分析该案中的冲突关系,可看出“特留份”可在这三种冲突关系中起到衔接与缓冲作用。日后修订《民法典》时可增加“特留份”制度,以优化该类案件纠纷的解决方式。The essence of the"Luzhou Bequest Case"lies in the multi-level conflict relationship it displays,which is refl ected at the institutional level,value level and interest level.It is the existence of this kind of confl ict relationship caused by the system that complicates this case.Behind the system confl ict is the value confl ict,and the system confl ict and value confl ict are manifested in the form of confl ict of interest.The breakthrough in resolving the three confl ict relationships lies in institutional confl icts.This article aims to analyze the confl ict relationships in this case from both theoretical and legal levels,and proposes that"special reservations"can play a connecting and buff ering role in these three confl ict relationships.It is recommended that a"special set aside"system be added when revising the Civil Code in the future to optimize the resolution of disputes in this type of case.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49