检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘雅妮 陈思民 肖艳[1,2] LIU Yani;CHEN Simin;XIAO Yan(School of Economics,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha,Hunan 410004,China;Hunan Provincial Research Center for High Quality Development of Industrial Economy,Changsha,Hunan 410004,China)
机构地区:[1]中南林业科技大学经济学院,湖南长沙410004 [2]湖南省产业经济高质量发展研究中心,湖南长沙410004
出 处:《毛纺科技》2024年第5期108-117,共10页Wool Textile Journal
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(17BGJ017)。
摘 要:为了量化各国环境规制对环境敏感型行业贸易竞争力的影响,以G20国家的纺织品贸易作为研究对象,采用横截面相关性检验、平稳性单位根检验、面板协整检验和面板FMOLS估计对1994—2020年G20国家的环境规制强度(EPSI)和纺织品出口显示比较优势指数(RCA)之间的关联性进行充分的计量验证。结果表明:二者间存在显著相关性,EPSI对纺织品出口RCA呈现出显著的负向影响;EPSI对纺织品出口RCA的影响程度在经济发展水平不同的国家之间表现出明显差异,环境规制对发展中国家纺织品出口的影响程度明显高于发达国家;日本和英国环境规制的加强对其纺织品出口竞争力的提升存在积极作用,证明了波特假说的有效性;环境规制对中国纺织品出口竞争力的负面影响弱于印度,显示出中国纺织品行业在国内环境规制的过程中形成了良好的行业应对策略,依然保证了持续性和较强的国际竞争力。最后提出建议:中国应密切关注国内环境规制对纺织品行业出口竞争力的动态变化,以确保中国纺织品出口竞争力的持续性;借鉴日本和英国的经验,将环境规制的负向影响转为正向影响;中国政府应大力提供应对国际环境规制的资金和技术等公共服务,降低行业应对环境规则的成本。In order to quantify the impact of environmental regulations on the trade competitiveness of environmentally sensitive industries in various countries,the textile trade of G20 countries was taken as the research object.Cross section correlation test,stationary unit root test,panel cointegration test,and panel FMOLS estimation were used to fully verify the correlation between the environmental regulation intensity EPSI and the textile export comparative advantage index RCA of G20 countries from 1994 to 2020.The results indicate that there is a significant correlation between the two,and EPSI has a significant negative impact on textile export RCA.The impact of EPSI on textile export RCA shows significant differences among countries with different levels of economic development,and the impact of environmental regulations on textile exports in developing countries is significantly higher than that in developed countries.The strengthening of environmental regulations in Japan and the United Kingdom has a positive impact on the competitiveness of their textile exports,proving the effectiveness of the Porter hypothesis.The negative impact of environmental regulations on China′s textile export competitiveness is weaker than that of India,indicating that the Chinese textile industry has developed good industry response strategies in the process of domestic environmental regulations,still ensuring sustainability and strong international competitiveness.This study suggests that China should closely monitor the dynamic changes in domestic environmental regulations on the export competitiveness of the textile industry to ensure the sustainability of China′s textile export competitiveness.Drawing on the experience of Japan and the United Kingdom,turn the negative impact of environmental regulation into a positive impact;The Chinese government should vigorously provide public services such as funding and technology to respond to international environmental regulations,and reduce the cost of industry response to environment
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7