该不该重建证据失权制度?——对目前学界争论的反思  

Should we reconstruct evidence disqualification system?——reflections on the current academic debate

作　　者：靳建丽[1] 张可 JIN Jianli;ZHANG Ke(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450001,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450001

出　　处：《河南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期71-78,共8页Journal of Henan University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：证据失权制度在我国先后经历了从充分肯定到饱受批评、最后被束之高阁的发展历程。目前,学界对是否应当重建证据失权制度有不同的声音。庭前准备程序不充分、当事人不具备证据收集能力、民事律师强制代理制度缺失都是证据失权制度运行受阻的原因。在该不该重建证据失权制度的选择上必须肯定证据失权的回归,但应充实庭前准备程序、重构证据失权构成要件、保障当事人的调查取证权并构建与之相匹配的强制答辩制度,以达到提高诉讼效率和保障实体公正的目的。The evidence disqualification system in China has experienced a journey from full affirmation to severe criticism,and finally to the back burner.Currently,there are different opinions in academia on whether the evidence disqualification system should be rebuilt.Insufficient pre-trial preparation procedures,parties lacking evidence collection capabilities,and the absence of a mandatory representation system for civil lawyers are all reasons hindering its operation.When deciding whether to reconstruct the evidence disqualification system,the return of evidence disqualification must be affirmed.However,it is crucial to enhance the pre-trial preparation procedures,reconstruct the elements of the evidence disqualification,guarantee the parties'right to investigate and collect evidence,and establish a matching mandatory defense system in order to improve the efficiency of litigation and ensure substantive justice.

关 键 词：证据失权制度 逾期举证 诉讼效率 实体公正 程序正义 

分 类 号：D924.36[政治法律—刑法学]