检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙琴 刘戒骄 Sun Qin;Liu Jie Jiao(School of Economics,Zhejiang University of Finance&Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China;Business School,Jiangxi Institute of Fashion Technology,Nanchang 330201,China;Institute of Industrial Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100006,China)
机构地区:[1]浙江财经大学经济学院,浙江杭州310018 [2]江西服装学院商学院,江西南昌330201 [3]中国社会科学院工业经济研究所,北京100006
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2024年第5期97-108,共12页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:中国社会科学院智库基础研究项目“关键核心技术创新政策跟踪研究”(SKZKJC2022-09);国家自然科学基金地区项目“组态视角下流域产业转型升级的驱动机理、政策效果与路径选择:以黄河几字湾为例”(72364028)。
摘 要:国家高新区与高新技术产业内部构成有所差异,但两者互为支撑、互为影响,存在很强的内在逻辑关联。在高质量发展战略引导下,探究国家高新区与高新技术产业的内在关联、耦合程度具有重要意义。本文从国家高新区与高新技术产业的耦合机理出发,从国家高新区对高新技术产业发展的驱动机理、高新技术产业对国家高新区高质量发展的反馈机理两个维度进行分析,构建国家高新区与高新技术产业综合评价指标体系,采用熵值法进行赋权,并测算两者的耦合度和耦合协调度,从不同视角分析其特征。实证结果表明:(1)两子系统的耦合协调度相比于全国整体走势而言是上升的,但不同时间区间耦合协调度的等级不同。2009—2011年,耦合协调度处于勉强与低度耦合等级之间,2012年达中级耦合水平,2018年起处于高度耦合类型。(2)分年度看,2009—2010年耦合协调度类型为勉强协调,2012—2013年为低度协调,2014—2019年为中度协调,2020年达到高度协调。(3)分区域看,近年来东部、中部、西部耦合协调度值高于东北地区,但各区域整体表现为波动中呈上升趋势。There are differences in the internal composition of national high-tech zones and high-tech industries,but the two support and influence each other,and there is a strong internal logical correlation.Under the guidance of high-quality development strategies,it is of great significance to explore the internal relationship and coupling degree between national high-tech zones and high-tech industries.Starting from the coupling mechanism between national high-tech zones and high-tech industries,this paper analyzes the driving mechanism of national high-tech zones for the development of high-tech industries,and the feedback mechanism of high-tech industries for the high-quality development of national high-tech zones.Then,it constructs a comprehensive evaluation index system for national high-tech zones and high-tech industries,uses entropy method to assign weights,and calculates the coupling degree and coupling coordination scheduling of the two,and analyzes its characteristics from different perspectives.The empirical results indicate the followings.①the coupling coordination degree of the two subsystems is increasing in the overall trend of the country,but the level of coupling coordination scheduling varies in different time intervals.From 2009 to 2011,the coupling coordination level was between barely and low coupling levels,reaching an intermediate coupling level in 2012,and a high coupling type since 2018.②From an annual perspective,the type of coupling coordination degree from 2009 to 2010 was barely coordinated,from 2012 to 2013 it was low coordinated,from 2014 to 2019 it was moderate coordinated,and only reached a high level of coordination in 2020.③From the regional perspective,the coupling coordination values of the eastern,central,and western regions have been higher in recent years than those of the northeastern region,but the overall performance of each region shows an upward trend in fluctuations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.251.131