论法律获取问题  

On the Issue of Legal Access

作　　者： 李剑(译) Philipp Heck

机构地区：[1]不详 [2]中南林业科技大学政法学院,湖南长沙410004

出　　处：《湖湘法学评论》2024年第2期142-160,共19页HUXIANG LAW REVIEW

摘　　要：利益法学的出现是德国法学发展中的一道分水岭。在它之前是独领风骚近百年的德国历史法学以及由其发展而来的概念法学,而在它之后则是延宕至今的评价法学。在批判当时处于主流地位的概念法学和反思同时代兴起的自由主义法学的背景下,利益法学应运而生。随之,德国法律人对法律适用的认知也发生了根本性的转变。在一定意义上,我们可以把利益法学看作是介于概念法学与自由主义法学之间的“中间道路”。这三个法学流派之间存在的差异就集中反映在各自的方法论立场上,具体表现为对法律解释或法律获取问题的不同理解。The emergence of interest jurisprudence is a watershed in the development of German jurisprudence.It was preceded by German historical jurisprudence and the conceptual jurisprudence developed from it for nearly a century,and after that it was the evaluative jurisprudence,which has been delayed to this day.In the context of criticizing the conceptual jurisprudence that was in the mainstream position at the time and reflecting on the liberal jurisprudence that emerged at the same time,the law of interest came into being.As a result,German legal practitioners’perception of the application of law has also ushered in a fundamental change.In a certain sense,we can see interest jurisprudence as a“middle way”between conceptual jurisprudence and liberal jurisprudence.The differences that exist between these three schools of jurisprudence are reflected in methodological positions,manifested in different understandings of legal interpretation or legal acquisition.

关 键 词：法律获取 概念法学 利益法学 自由主义法学 

分 类 号：D901[政治法律—法学理论]