实体与程序双重视角下危险作业罪司法适用的限制研究  

The Restriction Study on the Judicial Application of Dangerous Operation Crimefrom the Dual Perspective of Entity and Procedure

作　　者：宋振武[1] 刘洋 SONG Zhenwu;LIU Yang(Yantai University,Yantai 264005,China)

机构地区：[1]烟台大学法学院,山东烟台264005

出　　处：《南华大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期87-94,共8页Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：江苏省人民检察院课题“刑事一体化视野下危险作业罪司法适用的规范化研究”资助(编号:SJ202334);烟台大学研究生科技创新基金重点项目“流量劫持行为刑民责任界分机制研究”资助(编号:KGIFYTU2301)。

摘　　要：危险作业罪作为积极刑法观背景下新增轻罪,在当前司法实践中存在“生产、作业中”的外延勘定不明、“现实危险”的认定因素混乱、类案刑种的选择与裁量偏差过大等问题。基于预防重罪机能与限制入罪机能的考量,适宜将危险作业罪认定为业务过失具体危险犯。立足于实体与程序协同的治理立场对该罪进行限制,一方面需要采取实质理性的刑法解释对该罪的三种危险行为(侵害类行为、不作为类行为、未经许可或批准类行为)与现实危险状态进行实体法维度的限制,另一方面需要创设既独立于当前附条件不起诉制度又区别于当前酌定不起诉制度的微罪附条件不起诉制度对该罪运行进行程序法维度的过滤。Under the background of active criminal law,the addition of dangerous operation crime in the current judicial practice has the difficulties such as the unknown denotational survey of“production and operation”,the confusion of“real danger”,the selection of punishment types and the excessive deviation of the discretion.Based on the consideration of preventing felony function and limiting crime function,it is appropriate to identify the crime of dangerous operation as the specific dangerous crime of business negligence.Based on the governance stance of entity and procedural coordination,it is necessary to adopt a substantive and rational criminal law interpretation to restrict the three dangerous behaviors of the crime(infringement behavior,omission behavior,and unauthorized or approved behavior)and the actual dangerous state of the crime in the substantive law dimension,and on the other hand,it is necessary to create a microcrime conditional non-prosecution system that is independent of the current conditional non-prosecution system and different from the current discretionary non-prosecution system to filter the operation of the crime in the procedural law dimension.

关 键 词：实质刑法观 危险作业罪 协同治理 微罪附条件不起诉制度 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]