检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李玲玲 高浩然 LI Lingling;GAO Haoran(College of Humanities and Social Development,Northwest A&F University/Shaanxi Agricultural Law and Environmental Law Research Center,Yangling,Shaanxi712100,China)
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学人文社会发展学院/陕西省农业法环境法研究中心,陕西杨凌712100
出 处:《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第3期84-94,共11页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目(23BFX060)。
摘 要:为破解证据类型划分以及证据运用规则在土地纠纷中的适用难点,应用类案分析方法对土地纠纷司法裁判文书进行探析发现:在证据类型方面,以“人证、物证、书证”模式划分土地证据易致对其被动消极认定,“材料-证据-定案依据”模式存在行政机关取代审判主体认识的倾向,应审慎运用“证据资料-证据方法”二元结构,而按照“主要-一般-参考”模式进行划分具有现实意义;在证据运用规则方面,民事证据保全制度与土地纠纷解决无法完全适配,土地证据客体范围在常规证据收集制度下产生排斥现象,亟需释放土地纠纷电子证据的应用潜力。因此土地纠纷证据运用一方面需要以土地证据类型划分为基准,平衡土地证据举证责任;另一方面需要以土地证据适用认定为切入,构建“抗告-撤销-赔偿”的缓冲带。要打破部门法学科壁垒,以土地法条文为基底,合理解释土地证据规范,推进土地仲裁证据非诉化。In order to solve the difficulties in the classification of evidence types and the application of rules for the use of evidence in land disputes,this paper analyzes the judicial adjudication documents of land disputes by using the case-like analysis method,and finds that in the aspect of evidence types,the classification of land evidence by the mode of“witness,material evidence and documentary evidence”is easy to lead to passive identification,and the mode of“material-evidence-basis for deciding a case”tends to be replaced by administrative organs,so the dual structure of“evidence data-evidence method”should be used cautiously.As for the rules of evidence application,the civil evidence preservation system can not be fully adapted to the settlement of land disputes,and the object scope of land evidence is excluded under the conventional evidence collection system,so it is urgent to release the application potential of electronic evidence in land disputes.The research holds that the use of evidence in land disputes needs to balance the burden of proof based on the classification of land evidence on the one hand,and build a buffer zone of“protest-revocation-compensation”based on the identification of land evidence on the other hand.At the same time,it is also necessary to break down the barriers of departmental law,reasonably explain the norms of land evidence and promote the non-litigation of land arbitration evidence on the basis of land law provisions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49