农地产权制度改革与农地流转响应:预期偏离与逻辑阐释  

Regime Reform of Rural Land Property Rights and Response of Rural Land Circulation:Deviation From Expectation and Logical Interpretations

作　　者：武舜臣 曹丹丘 王兴华[4] WU Shunchen;CAO Danqiu;WANG Xinghua(Beijing Technology and Business University,Beijing100048;Rural Development Institute,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing100732;China Institute for Rural Studies,Tsinghua University,Beijing100048;College of Agricultural Economics and Management,Shanxi Agricultural University,Taiyuan030031,China)

机构地区：[1]北京工商大学,北京100048 [2]中国社会科学院农村发展研究所,北京100732 [3]清华大学中国农村研究院,北京100084 [4]山西农业大学农业经济管理学院,太原030031

出　　处：《西北农林科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期104-115,共12页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目(23CJY064);首都流通业研究基地开放课题(JD-KFKT-2020-001);山西省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(20210138);清华大学中国农村研究院研究课题(CIRS2024-11);中国社会科学院青年科研启动项目(2022YQNQD033)。

摘　　要：农地所有权归属集体以来,产权拆分及农民产权份额的扩大和强化是产权制度改革的主要思路。然而,理论上有效的农地产权制度改革,却在农地流转的推动成效方面呈现时段上的异质性。随着时间的演进,改革对农地流转的正面作用渐衰,甚至表现出对农地流转的抑制。为解释理论与现实的偏差,聚焦改革路径的形成逻辑,重点阐述了改革历程及改革对农地配置的影响成效,提炼出改革成效不足的系统性成因。研究认为,产权理论的引入为确定改革方向提供了理论依据,过去的改革经验为决策层延续产权赋予式改革提升了信心,规模经营路线的确立加强了坚持并推进改革的必要性和紧迫性。改革开放以后,农地产权制度朝着扩大集体成员权能的方向不断推进,却在现阶段表现出抑制农地流转并冲击农地承包权稳定性的负面影响。对此,构建了涵盖政策有效性、农地多功能性以及中央决策层认知调整在内的解释框架。认为在追求现代农业发展的目标导向下,扩大集体成员的土地权能并不可取,增强农村基本经营制度中“统”的作用并以社会保障弥补农户对农地的非生产性寄托是关键。Since the ownership of rural land belongs to the village collective,the main ideas of property rights regime reform have mainly focused on the separation of property rights and the expansion and strengthening of farmers’property rights shares.However,there is temporal heterogeneity for the effectiveness of theoretically effective regime reform of rural land property rights in promoting rural land circulation.With the advance of time,the positive effect of reform on rural land circulation has gradually declined.And in the later stage,it has even had a restraining effect.To explain the deviation between theory and practice,this paper summarizes the formation logic of the reform path,expounds the reform process and its impact on rural land allocation,and ultimately condenses the systematic causes of insufficient reform effectiveness.The study suggests that the introduction of property rights theory provides a theoretical basis for the reform of expanding the rights and powers of collective members.The increased historical experience of reform provides practical support for the selection of reform paths.As scale management is seen as a more effective mode for rural management,a reform approach aimed at expanding the power of collective members is gradually taking shape.After the reform and opening up,the regime of rural land property rights has been continuously advancing towards expanding the rights and powers of collective members.However,it inhibits the rural land circulation and lashes the stability of rural land contracting rights at this stage.The article constructs an interpretation framework,covering the policy effectiveness,farmland versatility,and cognitive adjustments of the central decision-making group.This paper suggests it is unadvisable to expand the land rights and powers of collective members under the goal orientation of pursuing modern rural development.The key is to enhance the role of unification in the basic rural management regime and compensate for the non-productive reliance of farmers on

关 键 词：农地产权制度 农地流转 阶段性偏离 产权制度改革 逻辑阐释 

分 类 号：F311[经济管理—产业经济]