反贫困视域下马克思与蒲鲁东的比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Marx and Proudhon from the Anti-Poverty Perspective

作　　者：陈婷 CHEN Ting(School of Marxism,Fujian Police College,Fuzhou,Fujian 350007)

机构地区：[1]福建警察学院马克思主义学院,福建福州350007

出　　处：《中国浦东干部学院学报》2024年第2期47-57,共11页Journal of China Executive Leadership Academy Pudong

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“马克思人民民主思想及其当代价值研究”(项目编号:19CKS010);福建省社会科学基金重大项目“习近平总书记关于斗争精神重要论述及其对福建落实‘敢为争先’的指导意义研究”(项目编号:FJ2023Z022)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：马克思与蒲鲁东是19世纪资本主义的同时代人。在一定意义上说,马克思主义与蒲鲁东主义都是在回答资本主义社会财富积聚与贫困积累并存的问题中产生的。围绕摆脱资本主义社会贫困的问题,马克思和蒲鲁东有着几十年的思想交往。但面对相同的时代课题,二人作出不同的理论解答。蒲鲁东早期对劳动者贫困现实的关注、对私有财产的批判以及寻求解决现代贫困的努力,得到过马克思的肯定,但他们在对贫困产生的社会历史根源的理解,所持的立场和方法论,以及对反贫困路径的选择等方面,存在根本的分歧。Marx and Proudhon were contemporaries of capitalism in the 19th century.In a certain sense,both Marxism and Proudhonism emerged in answering the question of the coexistence of wealth and poverty accumulation in capitalist society.Marx and Proudhon had decades of idea exchanges around the issue of poverty alleviation in capitalist society.Faced with the same issue of the times,they came up with different theoretical answers.Proudhon’s early attention to the poverty reality among labors,his criticism of private property and his efforts to seek solutions to modern poverty were recognized by Marx.However,their understanding of the social and historical roots of poverty,their stances and methodologies,and their choices of anti-poverty paths are fundamentally different.

关 键 词：马克思 蒲鲁东 现代贫困 反贫困 财产权 所有权 所有制 《哲学的贫困》 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]