实证主义论争的起因——对“波普尔-阿多诺之争”的反思  

Origins of the Positivism Debate:Reflection on the“Popper-Adorno Controversy”

作　　者：谢地坤 高继鑫 Xie Dikun;Gao Jixin

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学 [2]中国人民大学哲学院

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期50-56,201,共8页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：中国人民大学2022年度“中央高校建设世界一流大学(学科)和特色发展引导专项资金”的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：学界关于“德国社会学中的实证主义论争”的起因长期以来都存在误解。批判理性主义者认为实证主义论争的起因是哈贝马斯对波普尔的理论攻击,但波普尔与阿多诺之间本无实质分歧。达伦道夫意识到了波普尔和阿多诺之间的分歧,但将其理解为一种康德式立场和黑格尔式立场之间的冲突。根据对论争文本的考察可知,上述两种观点都是成问题的,图宾根会议上波普尔和阿多诺之间的分歧就是实证主义论争的起因,这从本质上表现了批判理论和批判理性主义对康德批判哲学的不同理解。There has long been a misunderstanding in academia regarding the origins of the “positivism debate in German sociology”. Critics of rationalism argue that the origin of the positivism debate lies in Habermas’ theoretical attack on Popper, but in reality, there was no substantive disagreement between Popper and Adorno. Dahrendorf recognized the divergence between Popper and Adorno but interpreted it as a conflict between a Kantian stance and a Hegelian stance. However, both of these views are problematic. A scrutiny of the texts of the debate reveals that the disagreement between Popper and Adorno at the Tübingen Conference was indeed the origin of the positivism debate, fundamentally demonstrating the different interpretations of Kantian critical philosophy by critical theory and critical rationalism.

关 键 词：批判哲学 实证主义论争 波普尔 阿多诺 图宾根会议 

分 类 号：B082[哲学宗教—哲学理论]