人类命运共同体背景下国际私法立法方向研究  

Research on the Orientation of Private International Law Legislation in the Context of the Community of Human Destiny

作　　者：任大卓 REN Dazhuo(School of Law,Anhui University,Hefei 230039,Anhui,China)

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《安徽工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第5期30-33,共4页Journal of Anhui University of Technology：Social Sciences

摘　　要：无论是巴托鲁斯的法则区别说,还是萨维尼的法律关系本座说,抑或是美国冲突法革命中产生的政府利益分析说,其本质都是设法从多个可能适用的不同国家或地区的法律规范中挑选出一个,但无论如何筛选,最终只能保留一个。这种零和博弈的思想与中国和平崛起互利共赢的指导路线存在根本分歧。为了形成中国国际私法的话语体系,提升国际影响力,建立统一的法律适用体系,国际私法法典化是必然选择。从长远来看,国际私法的立法方向应该是以人类命运共同体理论为思想基础的法典化。Whether it is Bartolus’s doctrine of the distinction of laws,Savigny’s doctrine of the propriety of legal relations,or the analysis of governmental interests that emerged from the conflict-of-laws revolution in the United States,the essence is to try to pick out one of the many legal norms of different countries or regions that may be applicable,but no matter how one sifts through them,in the end,only one can be retained.This zero-sum game ideology is fundamentally at odds with China’s guiding line of peaceful rise to mutual benefit and win-win situation.In order to form a discourse system of China’s private international law,enhance its international influence,and establish a unified system of legal application,codification of private international law is an inevitable choice.In the long run,the legislative direction of private international law should be codification based on the theory of community of human destiny.

关 键 词：国际私法 民法典 人类命运共同体 法典化 

分 类 号：DF97[政治法律—国际法学]