专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认机制研究  

Research on the judicial confirmation mechanism of patentdispute administrative mediation agreement

作　　者：高金娣 陈国敏 GAO Jindi;CHEN Guomin(Law School/Intellectual Property School,Zhongyuan University of Technology,Zhengzhou 450007,China)

机构地区：[1]中原工学院法学院/知识产权学院,河南郑州450007

出　　处：《中原工学院学报》2024年第2期69-73,共5页Journal of Zhongyuan University of Technology

基　　金：2023年度河南省知识产权软科学研究项目(20230106011);2023年河南省高等教育教学改革研究与实践项目(研究生教育类)(2023SJGLX047Y)。

摘　　要：专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认机制作为一种新兴的专利纠纷解决机制,既能通过司法确认赋予行政调解协议强制力,充分发挥行政保护高效便捷的优势,又能确保司法发挥主导性作用。但目前该机制存在着立法层面支持不足、司法确认范围不统一、司法确认申请主体受限、司法确认审查边界不清、错误确认的救济机制有待完善、相关主体存在认知偏差等诸多问题。针对以上问题,应该进一步完善专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认配套立法,科学构建专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认程序,做好专利纠纷行政调解协议司法确认制度实施的相关辅助工作。As an emerging mechanism for resolving patent disputes,judicial confirmation mechanism for administrative mediation agreements in patent disputes can not only endow administrative mediation agreements with coercive force through judicial confirmation and fully leverage the advantages of efficient and convenient administrative protection,but also ensure that the judiciary plays a leading role.However,there are many problems with this mechanism at present,such as insufficient legislative support,inconsistent scope of judicial confirmation,limited application subjects for judicial confirmation,unclear boundary of judicial confirmation review,incomplete relief mechanisms for confirmation,and cognitive biases among relevant parties.In response to the above issues,it is necessary to further improve the supporting legislation on judicial confirmation of patent dispute administrative mediation agreements,scientifically construct the judicial confirmation procedure for patent dispute administrative mediation agreements,and do a good job in supporting the implementation of the judicial confirmation system for patent dispute administrative mediation agreements.

关 键 词：专利纠纷 行政调解协议 司法确认 

分 类 号：DF5[政治法律—民商法学]