检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈文琼 CHEN Wen-qiong(School of Public Administration,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China)
出 处:《华南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第3期132-140,共9页Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(21CSH012)。
摘 要:通过对Z省S县和H省X县的田野调查,发现基层政府存在一定的制造风险的行为,主要表现为逾越上级政府对其行为所设定的规范或要求,其背后的动机往往是为了增加财政可支配收入或扩大对基层有限财政的支配权,从而缓解财政供需之间的矛盾;该行为生成于县域财政资金匮乏与横向竞争结构下政绩压力的双重挤压,由于“资源密集型”政绩的路径依赖,政府产生了大量的财政资源诉求,然而这种需求却难以通过当前匮乏的财政资源得到满足;为了将制造的风险限定在可控的范围之内,迎检、维稳和精英俘获都是基层转而采取的风险规避行为策略。The field research in S county Z province,and X county H province,found that the risk-producing behaviour of grass-roots governments mainly manifested itself in the form of exceeding top-down regulations/requirements governing the behaviour of grass-roots governments,aiming at increasing disposable financial revenue or increasing their control over limited grass-roots finances in order to alleviate the contradiction between supply and demand faced by the governments.This behavior is generated by the dual pressure of fiscal scarcity in the county and the pressure of performance under the horizontal competition structure.Due to the path dependence on″resource-intensive″performance,the government has generated a large number of demands for financial resources,which are difficult to satisfy through the current scarcity of financial resources.In order to control the risks to a manageable level,the grassroots have turned to risk-avoidance behavioral strategies such as welcoming inspections,maintaining stability,and capturing elites.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49