《补续高僧传》文本疏误辨考  

A Textual Discrimination on the Variants of Buxu Gaosengzhuan

作　　者：张敬霞 谭勤 ZHANG Jing-xia;TAN Qin(Research Institution for Ancient Books,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310028,China;Collaborative Innovation Center for Research and Inheritance of Chorography Culture,Zhejiang Normal University,Jinhua 321004,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学古籍研究所,浙江杭州310028 [2]浙江师范大学方志文化研究与传承协同创新中心,浙江金华321004

出　　处：《聊城大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第3期95-101,共7页Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：全国高校古委会项目(1877):《补续高僧传》校笺

摘　　要：明河历尽艰辛,撰成《补续高僧传》书稿二十六卷,有功僧史研究匪浅,也难免存在一些疏误。将《补续高僧传》文本与明河所据原始材料比勘,可以发现《补续高僧传》存在节略不当、系年疏误、采择不精、曲笔讳饰等明河编撰之失。《补续高僧传》仅有毛晋刻本存世,用他书对其进行校勘,可纠正其讹文、脱文、衍文、倒文等毛晋刊本之误。Minghe went through hardships and wrote a 26 volume manuscript titled Buxu Gaoseng-zhuan,which made great contributions to the study of the lives of monks,but it also had some errors.Comparing the text of the Buxu Gaosengzhuan with the original materials used by Minghe,it can be found that the Buxu Gaosengzhuan has problems such as inappropriate abridgment,incorrect timing,inaccurate selections and avoidance of taboos.The Buxu Gaosengzhuan has only the engraved version of Mao Jin.U-sing other books to proofread it can correct mistakes of the Mao Jin version such as erroneous,omitted,redundant,and inverted texts.

关 键 词：《补续高僧传》 编撰 传刻 疏误 辨考 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]