检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚建龙 Yao Jianlong
机构地区:[1]上海社会科学院
出 处:《法学》2024年第5期83-95,共13页Law Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目“未成年人司法先议权研究”(项目编号:20BFX099)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:我国刑法中不乏“情节恶劣”“情节严重”等抽象性法律规定,但是司法机关很多时候未能准确理解和适用这些规定,这是因为其无法很好地将价值判断与法律规范相结合。随着最有利于未成年人原则正式确立,以及未成年人性权利保护的指导案例的丰富与相关司法解释的施行,司法机关应当明确价值判断标准已然成为适用奸淫幼女“情节恶劣”之规定的重要指引。将该原则融入到性侵未成年人案件判断中,不仅能够在刑法教义学中找到适当的连接点,还能够在司法适用中寻得妥当解决方式。事实上,只要能够保证价值判断在刑法教义学的体系下进行,并且把握好价值判断的限度,价值判断就能为个案正义的实现提供助力。legal provisions such as“abominable circumstances”and“serious circumstances”in Chinese criminal law,but judicial authorities fail to accurately understand and apply these provisions because they can not do well in combining value judgment with legal norms.With the formal establishment of the principle of being most favorable to the child and the enrichment of guiding cases on the protection of the child's sexual rights,as well as the implementation of relevant judicial interpretations,judicial authorities should be aware that such standard of value judgment has become a pivotal guideline for the application of the provision on“abominable circumstances”of rape or sexual intercourse with a female child.Incorporating such a principle into the treatment of cases involving child sexual abuse not only enables the identification of a suitable nexus in criminal-law dogmatics but also provides a proper approach to judicial application.In fact,as long as the value judgment is guaranteed to be conducted within the framework of criminal-law dogmatics and the boundaries of value judgment are carefully delineated,the value judgment can significantly contribute to the attainment of justice in individual cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49