检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘涛 齐天成 Liu Tao;Qi Tiancheng(School of Civil and Commercial Law,Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan 250014,P.R.China;School of Finance and Taxation,Shandong University of Finance and Economics,Jinan 250014,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]山东政法学院民商法学院,济南250014 [2]山东财经大学财政税务学院,济南250014
出 处:《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第3期163-171,共9页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:山东省社科规划重点项目“双碳目标下绿色金融与山东省经济高质量发展研究”(22BJJJ04)。
摘 要:撤县设区是近年来中国实现快速城市化过程中的一项重要政策。那么,在“农业县”向“市辖区”转化的过程中,农户的收入水平提升了吗?基于2006—2020年县域面板数据,运用多期双重差分模型探究撤县设区对当地农户收入的影响,并对估计结果进行稳健性检验。研究发现,撤县设区政策的实施显著降低了被撤并县的农户收入。一方面,地方政府为实现快速城市化,会将较多的耕地转化为建设用地,从而降低农村人均资源保有量;另一方面,撤县设区也会影响原县级政府的财政支出安排,导致财政支农资金出现“越位“”错位”等问题,从而降低农户收入。进一步研究发现,发展普惠金融与财政权力下放能够作为撤县设区降低农户收入的纠偏机制。Achieving common prosperity is not only an essential requirement of the socialist system but also a crucial goal for China to realize socialist modernization.The overall improvement of income levels in rural areas is paramount in fulfilling this requirement.The administrative district restructuring method of“withdrawing counties into districts”serves not only as a significant means to promote urbanization but also as a vital tool to stimulate regional economic development and facilitate urban expansion.Distinguishing itself from existing research perspectives on administrative district restructuring,this paper focuses on rural areas as the research unit and employs the perspective on rural residents’income,enriching the understanding of the policy effects of the“withdrawing counties into districts”reform.Using the period from 2006 to 2020 as a quasi-natural experiment for the reform of“withdrawing counties into districts”in China,this paper employs a multi-time point Difference-in-Differences(DID)model to investigate the impact of the reform on rural residents’income.Various econometric methods are applied to test the robustness of the baseline regression results.The following conclusions are reached:(1)While existing academic research has confirmed the positive impact of“withdrawing counties into districts”on regional economic growth,But it is difficult to reconcile economic growth with income equity.Under the influence of this government-driven urbanization reform,local governments,aiming for rapid urbanization,tend to convert a considerable amount of arable land into construction land.This increases the resource endowment pressure on rural residents and reduces the per capita resource holding in rural areas.The decrease in the financial autonomy also affects the development planning of the original county governments,leading to lack and misallocation of funds for agricultural support.Consequently,the“withdrawing counties into districts”reform significantly reduces the rural residents’
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222