检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙广 张彦红 葛青茹 李雅晴 Sun Guang;Zhang Yanhong;Ge Qingru;Li Yaqing(China Hebei Construction&Geotechnical Investigation Group Ltd.)
出 处:《勘察科学技术》2024年第1期16-19,25,共5页Site Investigation Science and Technology
摘 要:该文结合某电厂堆载预压地基处理施工监测实例,对获取的大量监测数据进行了分析。通过对数据进行多项式拟合,采用三点法计算最终沉降量以及固结度;同时采用经验双曲线法计算软基处理的最终沉降量与固结度,并对两种方法进行分析。结果表明,经验双曲线法计算的固结度比三点法更小,指出了两种方法在实际工程中应用的注意事项,并做出了合理选择。This paper analyzes a large amount of monitoring data obtained by combining a construction monitoring example of a certain power plant’s preloading foundation treatment.By fitting polynomial to the data,the final settlement and consolidation degree are calculated by using the three-point method.At the same time,the empirical hyperbolic method is used to calculate the final settlement and consolidation degree of soft foundation treatment,and the two methods are analyzed.The results show that the consolidation degree calculated by the empirical hyperbolic method is smaller than that by the three-point method.Points out the precautions for the application of two methods in practical engineering and makes reasonable choices.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.74.222