检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵聚军[1] 王坤 ZHAO Jujun;WANG Kun(Zhou Enlai School of Government,Nankai University,Tianjin,300350,China)
机构地区:[1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300071
出 处:《行政论坛》2024年第2期90-102,共13页Administrative Tribune
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国政府职责体系建设研究”(17ZDA101)。
摘 要:中国的城市政府驻地通常具有强烈的资源聚集效应,政府驻地迁移对地方的经济和社会发展均具有深刻的影响。然而,无论是地方推动政府驻地迁移的主要政策目标,还是相关研究,均聚焦经济发展效应而对其民生性公共服务效应缺乏关注。为测度政府驻地迁移对民生性公共服务的影响,在收集了2003—2019年266个地级及以上城市数据并借助因子分析法构建民生性公共服务指标体系的基础上,通过运用双重差分法进行检验,结果显示,政府驻地迁移会对民生性公共服务产生显著负面效应,存在隐性的社会成本;通过影响机制分析发现,政府驻地迁移通过支出偏向和财政压力,产生了民生性公共服务挤出效应;通过异质性分析则表明,在行政等级、所处地区、政策时点和迁移距离等不同条件下,其影响的强度会有所变化。将政府驻地迁移的政策效应从经济发展扩展至民生性公共服务,不仅拓宽了研究视域,也具有一定的政策价值,既可以为相关决策提供科学支持,也能够为抑制城市政府的“空间生产”冲动提供学理依据。Urban government residents in China usually have a strong resource aggregation effect,and the relocation of government residents has a profound impact on both economic and social development of the localities.However,both the main policy objectives of local government to promote resident relocation and related studies have focused on the effects of economic development,but not on the the livelihood effects of public services.To measure the impact of government resident relocation on livelihood public service,this study constructs a livelihood public service index with the help of factor analysis,the result of the test by applying the difference-in-differences method based on the collecting data from 266 prefecture-level and above cities from 2003 to 2019 and shows that government resident relocation has a significant negative effect on livelihood public service,and there are hidden social costs.The analysis of influence mechanisms finds that government resident relocation crowds out livelihood public service through expenditure preferences and fiscal pressures.Further heterogeneity analyses show that the intensity of impacts varies under different administrative levels,regional distributions,policy backgrounds,and relocation distances.The study extends the policy effects of government resident relocation from economic development to livelihood public service,which not only broadens the research horizon,but also has certain policy value.The results can provide scientific support for relevant decision-making,as well as a theoretical basis for curbing the“spatial production”impulses of city governments.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.63.86